Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819903›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2025

Towards a common definition of hospital-acquired deconditioning in adults: a scoping review.

Meri Westlake, Alison Cowley, Katie Robinson, Adam L Gordon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meri WestlakeUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK meri.westlake1@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7060-1421
Alison CowleyResearch & Innovation, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Katie RobinsonUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1458-8186
Adam L GordonDivision of Rehabilitation and Ageing, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1676-9853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired deconditioning is a term used in clinical practice, describing a loss of physical and/or cognitive function associated with hospitalisation. Previous reviews have addressed interventions, its prevalence in older adults and potential assessment tools. However, each review has reported a core limitation, the need for an agreed-upon definition and diagnostic criteria for hospital-acquired deconditioning.

objectiveWe aimed to identify key components used to define hospital-acquired deconditioning in adults. We sought to do this by identifying diagnostic criteria, describing how authors operationalised Hospital- Acquired Deconditioning (HAD), and describing differences between HAD and other immobility-linked syndromes. This article focuses on how hospital-acquired deconditioning is understood and operationalised.

designA scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for evidence synthesis. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Published in English after 1 January 1990, investigating adults over 18, set in inpatient rehabilitation or acute care settings, and including either a definition or description of hospital-acquired deconditioning or an outline of strategies to assess, prevent or manage hospital-acquired deconditioning. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Published and grey literature, no restriction was placed on study design. CHARTING

methodsRelevant data, where available, was extracted from each source using a proprietary data extraction template.

resultsOne hundred and three articles were included from 2403 retrieved results. Thirty-three were from rehabilitation or post-acute care settings, 53 from acute care, 15 from intensive care and two from other settings. The literature was diverse in methodology and research question addressed. Hospital-acquired deconditioning was poorly defined, no consistent patterns were identified in aetiology and sequelae; diagnostic criteria were not fully agreed on.

conclusionsThe literature on hospital-acquired deconditioning is large, diverse and incomplete. Further work is required to develop a shared definition of hospital-acquired deconditioning, enabling researchers to coalesce for better understanding of the phenomenon, and clinicians, in turn, to better treat and mitigate against it. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF: https://osf.io/b5sgw/.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionHospitalizationAdultHumansHospitalizationInpatientsReview

Identifiers

PMID39819903
PMCPMC11751929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.