ArticleBMJ open2025
Preferences of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals on using noninvasive prenatal testing to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adolescents versus healthcare providers preferences for abortion services: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Jiangsu, China.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Preferences for Prenatal Care Among Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiment Studies.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNoninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to screen for fetal aneuploidies by analysing cell-free DNA in maternal plasma is available to pregnant women worldwide. In the future, the scope of NIPT could potentially be expanded to the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the preferences of pregnant women and obstetric healthcare professionals on this new test purpose of NIPT.
designA discrete choice experiment was designed to assess participants' preferences on the use of NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes regarding three attributes on test characteristics: test accuracy rate, unnecessary intervention rate and false reassurance rate. A questionnaire assessed general attitudes towards using noninvasive prenatal testing to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes.
settingDutch prenatal healthcare system.
participantsPregnant women with singleton pregnancies and obstetric healthcare professionals.
resultsIn total, 1580 pregnant women and 308 obstetric healthcare professionals participated in the discrete choice experiment. Higher test accuracy, fewer unnecessary interventions and less false reassurance all had a statistically significant (p<0.05) impact on the preference for a test. For pregnant women, the most important test characteristic when choosing a preferred test was the test accuracy rate, while for obstetric healthcare professionals, the most important test characteristic was the unnecessary intervention rate. The false reassurance rate was the least important test characteristic for both groups. Overall, 74% (n=1181) of pregnant women (strongly) agreed that NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes should be offered to pregnant women compared with 49% (n=151) of obstetric healthcare professionals.
conclusionsMost pregnant women have a positive attitude towards using NIPT to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes compared with slightly less than half of the obstetric healthcare professionals. Pregnant women prioritise a prognostic test with higher test accuracy, while obstetric healthcare professionals prioritise a test that results in fewer unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.