Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819894›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2025

Rural-Urban Disparities in State-Level Diabetes Prevalence Among US Adults, 2021.

Olga Khavjou, Zohra Tayebali, Pyone Cho, Kristopher Myers, Ping Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beyond Rurality: Individual Socioeconomic Status and Chronic Disease Prevalence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Rural-urban disparities in diabetes quality of care with accountable care organization participation.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga KhavjouRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Zohra TayebaliRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Pyone ChoCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kristopher MyersGoldbelt C6, LLC, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Ping ZhangCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed state-level disparities in diabetes prevalence among adults in rural and urban areas in the United States. Methods: We estimated state-specific diabetes prevalence in rural and urban areas in 41 states with applicable data from the 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Rural areas were defined based on the 2013 National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. We estimated diabetes odds ratios (ORs) in rural versus urban areas in each state by using logistic regressions adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and obesity status. Analyses were conducted in 2023. Results: In rural areas, diabetes prevalence was 14.3%, ranging from 8.4% in Colorado to 21.3% in North Carolina. In urban areas, the prevalence was 11.2%, ranging from 6.9% in Colorado to 15.5% in West Virginia. Unadjusted diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas were significant (P < .05) and greater than 1 for 19 states. After adjusting for age, sex, race, and ethnicity, the ORs were significant and greater than 1 for 7 states (Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, Oregon, and Virginia). With additional adjustment for education, income, and obesity status, diabetes ORs in rural versus urban areas remained significant and greater than 1 for 2 states (North Carolina and Oregon). Conclusion: Our findings reveal significant geographic disparities in diabetes prevalence between rural and urban areas in 19 states. The differences in most states may have been explained by rural-urban differences in sociodemographic characteristics and obesity rates. Our findings could inform decision makers to identify effective ways to reduce rural-urban disparities within states.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHealth Status DisparitiesRural PopulationUrban PopulationAdultAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39819894
PMCPMC11870018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.