Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819873›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2025

Effects of described demonstrator ability on brain and behavior when learning from others.

Ida Selbing, Nina Becker, Yafeng Pan, Björn Lindström, Andreas Olsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ida SelbingDivision of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. idaselbing@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4201-7340
Nina BeckerDivision of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Yafeng PanDivision of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-8313
Björn LindströmDivision of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Andreas OlssonDivision of Psychology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) 2014.0237Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) KAW 2021.0148National Science Foundation of China | International Cooperation and Exchange Programme 62207025National Science Foundation of China | International Cooperation and Exchange Programme 62337001Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2018-00877Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 4-968/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational learning enables us to make decisions by watching others' behaviors. The quality of such learning depends on the abilities of those we observe, but also on our beliefs about those abilities. We have previously demonstrated that observers learned better from demonstrators described as high vs. low in ability, regardless of their actual performance. The current study aimed to conceptually replicate these findings, and explore the neural mechanisms involved. Forty-five participants performed an observational learning task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We hypothesized that participants would perform better when demonstrators were described as having high vs. low ability. Unexpectedly, participants performed equally well regardless of described demonstrator ability. The behavioral effects of biased observational learning seem to be driven by mentalizing processes together with general learning and decision-making processes.

Identifiers

PMID39819873
PMCPMC11739481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.