Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819839›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2025

Neural Speech Tracking Contribution of Lip Movements Predicts Behavioral Deterioration When the Speaker's Mouth Is Occluded.

Patrick Reisinger, Marlies Gillis, Nina Suess, Jonas Vanthornhout, Chandra Leon Haider, Thomas Hartmann, Anne Hauswald, Konrad Schwarz, Tom Francart, Nathan Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patrick ReisingerDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-708X
Marlies GillisExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-2950
Nina SuessDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-9281
Jonas VanthornhoutExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1503-599X
Chandra Leon HaiderDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1812-3899
Thomas HartmannDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-8125
Anne HauswaldDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-0807
Konrad SchwarzMED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5814-9519
Tom FrancartExperimental Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-4261
Nathan WeiszDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria nathan.weisz@plus.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-0037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observing lip movements of a speaker facilitates speech understanding, especially in challenging listening situations. Converging evidence from neuroscientific studies shows stronger neural responses to audiovisual stimuli compared with audio-only stimuli. However, the interindividual variability of this contribution of lip movement information and its consequences on behavior are unknown. We analyzed source-localized magnetoencephalographic responses from 29 normal-hearing participants (12 females) listening to audiovisual speech, both with and without the speaker wearing a surgical face mask, and in the presence or absence of a distractor speaker. Using temporal response functions to quantify neural speech tracking, we show that neural responses to lip movements are, in general, enhanced when speech is challenging. After controlling for speech acoustics, we show that lip movements contribute to enhanced neural speech tracking, particularly when a distractor speaker is present. However, the extent of this visual contribution to neural speech tracking varied greatly among participants. Probing the behavioral relevance, we demonstrate that individuals who show a higher contribution of lip movements in terms of neural speech tracking show a stronger drop in comprehension and an increase in perceived difficulty when the mouth is occluded by a surgical face mask. In contrast, no effect was found when the mouth was not occluded. We provide novel insights on how the contribution of lip movements in terms of neural speech tracking varies among individuals and its behavioral relevance, revealing negative consequences when visual speech is absent. Our results also offer potential implications for objective assessments of audiovisual speech perception.

Indexed as

BrainLipPerceptual MaskingSpeechSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMaleMouthMovementYoung Adultaudiovisual speechlip movementsMEGneural trackingtemporal response functionsTRF

Identifiers

PMID39819839
PMCPMC11801124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.