ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2025
Discovery of Methylated DNA Biomarkers for Potential Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: recent advances and next steps.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of gastrointestinal cancers: Current landscape and emerging technologies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Emerging Biomarkers for Managing Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Strategies to prevent Barrett's esophagus associated esophageal adenocarcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- The Evolving Paradigm of Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: Current Insights, Emerging Therapies, and Future Directions.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2025Article
- DNA methylation in esophageal cancer: technological advances and early detection clinical applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWe sought to develop a minimally invasive, robust, accessible nonendoscopic strategy to diagnose Barrett's esophagus (BE), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), and its immediate precursor lesion, high-grade dysplasia (HGD) based on methylated DNA biomarkers applied to a retrievable sponge-capsule device in a cohort representative of the BE population (i.e., mostly short-segment, nondysplastic BE [NDBE]).
methodsWe identified 12 candidate methylation markers to distinguish normal vs abnormal esophagus. These 12 markers were first assayed in 21-paired matched NDBE-normal esophageal tissues, then assessed in a case-control study of 234 esophageal samples collected using a sponge-capsule device. A classification algorithm was developed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator in a 199-patient training set and tested in an independent 35-patient test set.
resultsTwelve markers ( A1BG , C9orf50 , cg00720137 , FLI1 , GRAMD1B , HOXB13 , IRF4 , KCNQ3 , NTNG1 , SPX , TBC1D30 , and USP44 ) were significantly hypermethylated (i.e., all P < 0.05) in BE vs matched normal esophageal biopsies. A discriminatory 3-gene least absolute shrinkage and selection operator panel ( USP44 , TBC1D30 , and NELL1 ), adjusted for age and sex, accurately distinguished HGD or EAC from normal control patients in both training (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.911, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.863-0.959) and test (AUC 0.969, 95% CI 0.911-1.00) sets. In normal vs NDBE/LGD/HGD/EAC patients, this algorithm exhibited AUCs of 0.862 (95% CI 0.812-0.912) and 0.864 (95% CI 0.745-0.982) in training and test sets, respectively. In normal vs NDBE patients, the algorithm yielded AUCs of 0.819 (95% CI 0.748-0.889) and 0.776 (95% CI 0.583-0.968) in training and test sets, respectively. DISCUSSION: This discriminatory biomarker panel algorithm exemplifies a practical nonendoscopic strategy to diagnose BE, HGD, and EAC using a minimally invasive sponge-capsule device coupled with DNA methylation markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.