ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Method Using Vocal Biomarkers for Identifying Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Models for Optimizing Patient Recruitment Decisions in Voice Data Generation Projects.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Article
- Examination of Social Participation in Older Adults Undergoing Frailty Health Checkups Using Deep Learning Models.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and multi-cohort validation of a machine learning-based simplified frailty assessment tool for clinical risk prediction.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The two most commonly used methods to identify frailty are the frailty phenotype and the frailty index. However, both methods have limitations in clinical application. In addition, methods for measuring frailty have not yet been standardized. Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a classification model for predicting frailty status using vocal biomarkers in community-dwelling older adults, based on voice recordings obtained from the picture description task (PDT). Methods: We recruited 127 participants aged 50 years and older and collected clinical information through a short form of the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment scale. Voice recordings were collected with a tablet device during the Korean version of the PDT, and we preprocessed audio data to remove background noise before feature extraction. Three artificial intelligence (AI) models were developed for identifying frailty status: SpeechAI (using speech data only), DemoAI (using demographic data only), and DemoSpeechAI (combining both data types). Results: Our models were trained and evaluated on the basis of 5-fold cross-validation for 127 participants and compared. The SpeechAI model, using deep learning-based acoustic features, outperformed in terms of accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 80.4% (95% CI 76.89%-83.91%) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), respectively, while the model using only demographics showed an accuracy of 67.96% (95% CI 67.63%-68.29%) and an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.73-0.75). The SpeechAI model outperformed the model using only demographics significantly in AUC (t4=8.705 [2-sided]; P<.001). The DemoSpeechAI model, which combined demographics with deep learning-based acoustic features, showed superior performance (accuracy 85.6%, 95% CI 80.03%-91.17% and AUC 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97), but there was no significant difference in AUC between the SpeechAI and DemoSpeechAI models (t4=1.057 [2-sided]; P=.35). Compared with models using traditional acoustic features from the openSMILE toolkit, the SpeechAI model demonstrated superior performance (AUC 0.89) over traditional methods (logistic regression: AUC 0.62; decision tree: AUC 0.57; random forest: AUC 0.66). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that vocal biomarkers derived from deep learning-based acoustic features can be effectively used to predict frailty status in community-dwelling older adults. The SpeechAI model showed promising accuracy and AUC, outperforming models based solely on demographic data or traditional acoustic features. Furthermore, while the combined DemoSpeechAI model showed slightly improved performance over the SpeechAI model, the difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that speech-based AI models offer a noninvasive, scalable method for frailty detection, potentially streamlining assessments in clinical and community settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.