ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2025
Exploring the boundaries of anastomotic leak: experience in a high-volume center.
Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Smaller Circular Staplers Do Not Compromise Postoperative Quality of Life in Esophagojejunostomy: A CT-Based Clinical Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
- Clinical risk factors for multidrug-resistant organism infections in postoperative gastric cancer patients: an ICU-based retrospective analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Rendezvous Stenting Technique for Anastomotic Leak After Total Gastrectomy: A Feasibility Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Association between Candida esophagitis and esophagojejunal leakage following total gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer remains a major global health challenge, ranking fourth in cancer-related deaths. Total gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment, with advancements in surgery shifting towards minimally invasive techniques to reduce surgical trauma and metabolic response. Esophagojejunal anastomotic leak is a frequent complication of gastrectomy, significantly increasing morbidity and mortality rates by up to 64%. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study reviewed adults undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer who developed esophagojejunal anastomotic leaks. The study described patient characteristics, diagnostic methods, and management at Clinica Universitaria Colombia from 2013 to 2023.
resultsAmong 500 patients who had total gastrectomy, 54 developed esophagojejunal leaks. The cohort was 64.8% male, average age 55.2 years (± 14.87), and average BMI 24.5 kg/m². Notably, 18.5% smoked, 11.1% had lung disease, and 9.3% had heart disease or diabetes. Chest tomography was used in 60% of cases, followed by endoscopy in 35.2%. Endoscopic management with fully covered stents was the main strategy, used in 84% of cases. Average hospitalization was 18 days, with 33% needing intensive care, and overall hospital stay was 23.31 ± 16.33 days. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant and elective laparoscopic surgeries had a significant 30-day mortality risk.
conclusionsDespite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative management, esophagojejunal anastomotic leaks continue to represent a serious complication, increasing morbidity and mortality. Therefore, early postoperative detection, based on the patient's clinical signs that allow confirmatory studies to be performed, is crucial. This facilitates the implementation of timely treatments, whether conservative, through the use of endoscopic or percutaneous strategies, or surgical procedures. The next step for the scientific community will be to conduct studies with long-term follow-ups to ensure consistency of the high-quality results reported so far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.