Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819590›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Orthognathic surgery-related condylar resorption in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion versus class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Cristina Faria-Teixeira, Francisco Azevedo-Coutinho, Ângelo David Serrano, Rosa María Yáñez-Vico, Francisco Salvado E Silva, António Vaz-Carneiro, Alejandro Iglesias-Linares

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Cristina Faria-TeixeiraSchool of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-0773
Francisco Azevedo-CoutinhoSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1200, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0467-7057
Ângelo David SerranoSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1200, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-9946
Rosa María Yáñez-VicoSchool of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-1568
Francisco Salvado E SilvaSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1200, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1095-8090
António Vaz-CarneiroSchool of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, 1200, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2783-0544
Alejandro Iglesias-LinaresSchool of Dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain. aleigl01@ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9063-1612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrthodontic-orthognathic treatment is the standard of care for moderate and/or severe skeletal class III (SCIII) malocclusion. Following orthognathic surgery, morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint structures (TMJ) may contribute to condylar resorption (CR).

objectivesThis systematic review aimed to identify the morphological signs of condylar resorption (changes in the condylar head, position, neck, disk, and joint space) following orthognathic surgery in patients with SCIII compared with those with skeletal class II (SCII) malocclusion. Furthermore, surgical techniques were assessed to investigate the extent to which orthognathic surgery may be related to TMJ disorders and potential muscular changes.

methodsA systematic search was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Grey Open literature databases [May 2023; PROSPERO: CRD42021293105)]. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were assessed for quality and the risk of bias using MINORS. A meta-analysis was also conducted.

resultsEleven of the 1014 studies met the eligibility criteria. Of the eligible studies, 10 were considered high-quality. Our results indicated that the incidence of condylar resorption was higher in the SCII group (46.7%) than in the SCIII group (37.2%). The condylar angle was preoperatively higher in the SCII group, and this tendency did not change during the follow-up period. No statistically significant differences in condylar width (95% CI: - 0.62 to 0.43; p = 0.72), height changes (95% CI: - 0.92 to 0.46; p = 0.46), ramus angle (95% CI: - 0.63 to 2.56; p = 0.24) were found between groups. The results suggested that TMJ symptoms were similar between the groups pre- and postoperatively. However, the SCII group showed a higher incidence of anterior disc displacement. Furthermore, postoperative cross-sectional measurements of the lateral pterygoid, medial pterygoid, and masseter muscles were significantly different between the groups.

conclusionCR could be related to specific skeletal pattern, and the extension of surgical movements may be a risk factor. However, the definition of CR remains vague, and no categorization system regarding SCIII patients has been reported to date.

Indexed as

Bone ResorptionMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIMandibular CondyleOrthognathic Surgical ProceduresHumansTemporomandibular Joint DisordersCondylar remodelingCondylar resorptionOrthodontic-orthognathic treatmentOrthognathic surgeryPrognathismSkeletal class III

Identifiers

PMID39819590
PMCPMC11737090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.