Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819585›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Assessing the Current Limitations of Large Language Models in Advancing Health Care Education.

JaeYong Kim, Bathri Narayan Vajravelu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Blinded by the Bot: Benchmarking GPT and Gemini Against Human Authors in Otolaryngology Reviews.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of reference management software with new artificial intelligence-based tools.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

JaeYong Kim *School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-5855-7676
Bathri Narayan Vajravelu *Department of Physician Assistant Studies, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 179 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States, 1 6177322961.ORCID 0000-0002-1558-2651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The integration of large language models (LLMs), as seen with the generative pretrained transformers series, into health care education and clinical management represents a transformative potential. The practical use of current LLMs in health care sparks great anticipation for new avenues, yet its embracement also elicits considerable concerns that necessitate careful deliberation. This study aims to evaluate the application of state-of-the-art LLMs in health care education, highlighting the following shortcomings as areas requiring significant and urgent improvements: (1) threats to academic integrity, (2) dissemination of misinformation and risks of automation bias, (3) challenges with information completeness and consistency, (4) inequity of access, (5) risks of algorithmic bias, (6) exhibition of moral instability, (7) technological limitations in plugin tools, and (8) lack of regulatory oversight in addressing legal and ethical challenges. Future research should focus on strategically addressing the persistent challenges of LLMs highlighted in this paper, opening the door for effective measures that can improve their application in health care education.

Indexed as

Health EducationCommunicationHumansLarge Language ModelsAIartificial intelligenceChatGPTgenerative pretrained transformerhealth care deliveryhealth care educationlarge language modelLLM

Identifiers

PMID39819585
PMCPMC11756841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.