Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819576›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: evaluation of a blended learning approach.

Helen Allott, Alan Smith, Sarah White, Irene Nyaoke, Ogoti Evans, Michael Oriwo Oduor, Steven Karangau, Sheila Sawe, Nassir Shaaban, Ochola Ephraim and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Helen AllottEmergency Obstetric Care and Quality of Care Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK. Helen.Allott@lstmed.ac.uk.
Alan SmithEmergency Obstetric Care and Quality of Care Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.
Sarah WhiteEmergency Obstetric Care and Quality of Care Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.
Irene NyaokeLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ogoti EvansDirectorate of Reproductive Health, Moi University Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Michael Oriwo OduorBondo Subcounty Hospital, Bondo, Kenya.
Steven KarangauMuriranjas Subcounty Hospital, Murang'a, Kenya.
Sheila SaweDirectorate of Reproductive Health, Moi University Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Nassir ShaabanDirectorate of Reproductive Health, Moi University Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Ochola EphraimDirectorate of Reproductive Health, Moi University Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH), Eldoret, Kenya.
Charles Anawo AmehEmergency Obstetric Care and Quality of Care Unit, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office 202549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignificant differences in outcomes for mothers and babies following obstetric surgical interventions between low- and middle-income countries and high-income settings have demonstrated a need for improvements in quality of care and training of obstetric surgical and anaesthetic providers. To address this, a five-day face-to-face training intervention was developed. When roll-out was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the course was redesigned for delivery by blended learning.

methodsThis 3-part blended-learning course (part-1: 15 h self-directed online learning, part-2: 13 h facilitated contemporaneous virtual workshops and part-3: 10 h face-to-face delivery), was conducted in Kenya. We assessed the completion rate of part-1 (21 assignments), participation rate in parts 2 and 3, participant satisfaction and change in knowledge and skills. Additionally, we compared the cost of the blended delivery to the 5-day face-to-face delivery, in GB pounds.

resultsSixty-five doctors participated in part 1, with 53 completing at least 90% of the assignments. Sixty doctors participated in part 2, and 53 participated in part 3. All participants who completed an evaluation reported (n = 53) that the training was relevant, useful and would lead to changes in their clinical practice. Mean (SD) knowledge score improved from 64% (7%) to 80% (8%) and practical skills from 44% (14%) to 87% (7%). The blended course achieved a cost-saving of £204 per participant compared to the 5-day face-to-face delivery approach.

conclusionWe have demonstrated that a blended learning approach to clinical training in a low-resource setting is feasible, acceptable and cost effective. More studies are required to investigate the effectiveness of this approach on health outcomes.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceObstetricsObstetric Surgical ProceduresAdultClinical CompetenceCOVID-19FemaleHumansKenyaPregnancySARS-CoV-2Blended learningCaesareanEducationQuality of careSurgeryTraining

Identifiers

PMID39819576
PMCPMC11740444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.