ArticleRespiratory research2025
Optimization of a micro-scale air-liquid-interface model of human proximal airway epithelium for moderate throughput drug screening for SARS-CoV-2.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Donor-derived airway air-liquid interface model for high-throughput screening of antiviral combinations with concurrent analysis of antiviral efficacy and epithelial toxicity using ciliR.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- How new approach methods are reshaping virology research.Journal of virology · 2026Review
- Bioprinted Four-Cell-Type Lung Model for Viral Infection Studies Under Air-Liquid Interface Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Compound screening in human airway basal cells identifies Wnt pathway activators as potential pro-regenerative therapies.Journal of cell science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany respiratory viruses attack the airway epithelium and cause a wide spectrum of diseases for which we have limited therapies. To date, a few primary human stem cell-based models of the proximal airway have been reported for drug discovery but scaling them up to a higher throughput platform remains a significant challenge. As a result, most of the drug screening assays for respiratory viruses are performed on commercial cell line-based 2D cultures that provide limited translational ability.
methodsWe optimized a primary human stem cell-based mucociliary airway epithelium model of SARS-CoV-2 infection, in 96-well air-liquid-interface (ALI) format, which is amenable to moderate throughput drug screening. We tested the model against SARS-CoV-2 parental strain (Wuhan) and variants Beta, Delta, and Omicron. We applied this model to screen 2100 compounds from targeted drug libraries using a high throughput-high content image-based quantification method.
resultsThe model recapitulated the heterogeneity of infection among patients with SARS-CoV-2 parental strain and variants. While there were heterogeneous responses across variants for host factor targeting compounds, the two direct-acting antivirals we tested, Remdesivir and Paxlovid, showed consistent efficacy in reducing infection across all variants and donors. Using the model, we characterized a new antiviral drug effective against both the parental strain and the Omicron variant.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the 96-well ALI model of primary human mucociliary epithelium can recapitulate the heterogeneity of infection among different donors and SARS-CoV-2 variants and can be used for moderate throughput screening. Compounds that target host factors showed variability among patients in response to SARS-CoV-2, while direct-acting antivirals were effective against SARS-CoV-2 despite the heterogeneity of patients tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.