Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819559›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Unbiased identification of cell identity in dense mixed neural cultures.

Sarah De Beuckeleer, Tim Van De Looverbosch, Johanna Van Den Daele, Peter Ponsaerts, Winnok H De Vos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah De BeuckeleerLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-4480
Tim Van De LooverboschLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-1395
Johanna Van Den DaeleLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8879-4551
Peter PonsaertsLaboratory of Experimental Haematology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (Vaxinfectio), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-6499
Winnok H De VosLaboratory of Cell Biology and Histology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-6781

Funding

Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen HBC.2023.0155Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1274822NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1SB7423NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G033322NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I000123NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek I003420NUniversiteit Antwerpen 41739Universiteit Antwerpen 44742Universiteit Antwerpen 48955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is revolutionizing cell biology. However, the variability between individual iPSC lines and the lack of efficient technology to comprehensively characterize iPSC-derived cell types hinder its adoption in routine preclinical screening settings. To facilitate the validation of iPSC-derived cell culture composition, we have implemented an imaging assay based on cell painting and convolutional neural networks to recognize cell types in dense and mixed cultures with high fidelity. We have benchmarked our approach using pure and mixed cultures of neuroblastoma and astrocytoma cell lines and attained a classification accuracy above 96%. Through iterative data erosion, we found that inputs containing the nuclear region of interest and its close environment, allow achieving equally high classification accuracy as inputs containing the whole cell for semi-confluent cultures and preserved prediction accuracy even in very dense cultures. We then applied this regionally restricted cell profiling approach to evaluate the differentiation status of iPSC-derived neural cultures, by determining the ratio of postmitotic neurons and neural progenitors. We found that the cell-based prediction significantly outperformed an approach in which the population-level time in culture was used as a classification criterion (96%

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsNeuronsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationHumansNeural Networks, Computercell biologycell paintingcomputational biologycyclic imagingdeep learninghumaniPSC culturemorphological phenotypingneural differentiationsystems biology

Identifiers

PMID39819559
PMCPMC11741521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.