ReviewCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Advanced Targeted Therapy for Colorectal Cancer with Lipid Nanoparticles.
Review in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of LNP@2DG-DON liposomal nanoparticles in tumor inhibition and immune activation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine delivery systems remodel the immunosuppressive microenvironment of colorectal cancer: synergistic strategies and mechanisms of targeted immune checkpoint inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Drug Release, Entrapment Efficacy, and Drug Loading Capacity of Taxanes Loaded Solid Lipid Nanoparticles (SLNs).Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Targeted therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) appears to have great potential with lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The advances in LNP-based techniques, such as liposomes, exosomes, micelles, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), nano-cubosomes, and plant- derived LNPs (PDLNPs), are explored in detail in this thorough review. Every platform provides distinct advantages: liposomes enable precise drug release and improved delivery; exosomes function as organic nanocarriers for focused treatment; SLNs offer greater stability; micelles enhance drug solubility and resistance; nano-cubosomes tackle low bioavailability; and PDLNPs offer biocompatible substitutes. The mechanisms, benefits, drawbacks, and therapeutic potential of these LNP platforms in the treatment of colorectal cancer are highlighted in the review. The review highlights how crucial it is to use these technologies for efficient CRC management and looks at potential future developments for them. The controlled release properties of liposomes and solid liposome nanoparticles (SLNs) improve the stability and bioavailability of medicinal compounds. On the other hand, exosomes and micelles provide answers for medication resistance and solubility issues, respectively. Novel strategies for resolving bioavailability problems and enhancing biocompatibility include nano-cubosomes and PDLNPs. These LNP-based systems are promising in clinical applications for boosting therapeutic efficacy, decreasing systemic toxicity, and facilitating tailored drug delivery. By incorporating these nanotechnologies into CRC treatment plans, present therapeutic approaches may be completely changed, and more individualized and efficient treatment choices may be provided. To completely comprehend the advantages and drawbacks of these LNP systems in therapeutic settings, as well as to and optimize them, more study is recommended by the review. Treatment for colorectal cancer may be much improved in the future thanks to developments in LNP-based drug delivery systems. These technologies hold great promise for improving patient outcomes and advancing the field of oncology by tackling important issues related to medication delivery and bioavailability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39819540What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.