Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819513›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over the Frontopolar Cortex Promotes Willingness to Exert Cognitive Effort in a Foraging-Like Sequential Choice Task.

Mario Bogdanov, Laura A Bustamante, Sean Devine, Signy Sheldon, A Ross Otto

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Frontopolar Cortex Contributes to Motivating Cognitive Effort Exertion during Adaptive Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mario BogdanovDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G1, Canada mbogdanov1@mclean.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2386-3557
Laura A BustamanteDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130.ORCID 0000-0002-2539-0602
Sean DevineDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0445-2763
Signy SheldonDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-9866
A Ross OttoDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-1901

Funding

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSET32DA007261 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ARPANA AGRAWAL, Jose A Moron-Concepcion · 1991 to 2026
$8.8M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals avoid spending cognitive effort unless expected rewards offset the perceived costs. Recent work employing tasks that provide explicit information about demands and incentives suggests causal involvement of the frontopolar cortex (FPC) in effort-based decision-making. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we examined whether the FPC's role in motivating effort generalizes to sequential choice problems in which task demand and reward rates vary indirectly and as a function of experience. In a double-blind, within-subject design, 46 participants (36 female, 8 male, 1 "neither/other") received anodal (i.e., excitatory) or sham stimulation over the right FPC during an Effort Foraging Task, which required choosing between harvesting patches for successively decreasing resources or traveling to replenished patches by performing a cognitive task with environment-specific difficulty. As expected, participants exited patches later (i.e., exhibited lower exit thresholds) when traveling required greater (versus less) effort, indicating increased travel costs in high-effort environments. Under anodal tDCS, the difference in exit thresholds between environments was significantly smaller relative to sham. Finally, individual differences analyses hint that participants with lower self-reported motivation to exert effort exhibited greater travel cost reductions following tDCS. Together, these findings support the theorized causal role of the FPC in motivating cognitively effortful behavior, expand its role to more ecologically valid serial decisions, and highlight the potential for tDCS as a tool to increase motivation with potential clinical applications.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCognitionFrontal LobeMotivationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleRewardYoung Adultbrain stimulationcognitive effortcomputational modelingdecision-makingmotivationprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID39819513
PMCPMC11884395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.