Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819496›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Encoding of cerebellar dentate neuron activity during visual attention in rhesus macaques.

Nico A Flierman, Sue Ann Koay, Willem S van Hoogstraten, Tom J H Ruigrok, Pieter Roelfsema, Aleksandra Badura, Chris I De Zeeuw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Comparison of Signals from Cerebellar Purkinje Cells and Deep Nuclei during Temporal Prediction in Primates.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Axonal pathology differentially affects human Purkinje cell subpopulations in the essential tremor cerebellum.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nico A Flierman *Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-8228
Sue Ann Koay *Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9648-2475
Willem S van HoogstratenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-4893
Tom J H RuigrokDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5537-1165
Pieter RoelfsemaNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-0034
Aleksandra BaduraDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-5108
Chris I De ZeeuwNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5628-8187

Funding

Erasmus Medical Center Convergence FlagshipEuropean Research Council 737619 and 768914European Research Council Advanced Grant 101052963 'NUMEROUS' PREuropean Research Council GA-294775INTENSE LSH-NWO TTW/00798883Medical Neuro-Delta MD 01092019-31082023Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Dutch NWO Gravitation Program DBI2Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO-ALW 824.02.001Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Vidi/ZonMw/917.18.380,2018ZonMw ZonMW 91120067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of cerebellum in controlling eye movements is well established, but its contribution to more complex forms of visual behavior has remained elusive. To study cerebellar activity during visual attention we recorded extracellular activity of dentate nucleus (DN) neurons in two non-human primates (NHPs). NHPs were trained to read the direction indicated by a peripheral visual stimulus while maintaining fixation at the center, and report the direction of the cue by performing a saccadic eye movement into the same direction following a delay. We found that single-unit DN neurons modulated spiking activity over the entire time course of the task, and that their activity often bridged temporally separated intra-trial events, yet in a heterogeneous manner. To better understand the heterogeneous relationship between task structure, behavioral performance, and neural dynamics, we constructed a behavioral, an encoding, and a decoding model. Both NHPs showed different behavioral strategies, which influenced the performance. Activity of the DN neurons reflected the unique strategies, with the direction of the visual stimulus frequently being encoded long before an upcoming saccade. Moreover, the latency of the ramping activity of DN neurons following presentation of the visual stimulus was shorter in the better performing NHP. Labeling with the retrograde tracer Cholera Toxin B in the recording location in the DN indicated that these neurons predominantly receive inputs from Purkinje cells in the D1 and D2 zones of the lateral cerebellum as well as neurons of the principal olive and medial pons, all regions known to connect with neurons in the prefrontal cortex contributing to planning of saccades. Together, our results highlight that DN neurons can dynamically modulate their activity during a visual attention task, comprising not only sensorimotor but also cognitive attentional components.

Indexed as

AttentionCerebellar NucleiNeuronsVisual PerceptionAnimalsMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationSaccadescerebellumcognitiondentate nucleusheterogeneous activityneuroscienceprefrontal cortexrhesus macaquevisual attention

Identifiers

PMID39819496
PMCPMC11737872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.