Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819466›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

The clinical application and anatomical analysis of proximal peroneal artery perforator in free fibula flap based on CTA.

Yitong Zhao, Danwei Xiang, Lina Song, Zhujiajun Cui, Xingwu Zheng, Tianyu Zhang, Huihui Yang, Yongzhen Fu, Qilin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yitong Zhao *Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Danwei Xiang *Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Lina SongDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhujiajun CuiDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xingwu ZhengDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Tianyu ZhangDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Huihui YangDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yongzhen FuDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Qilin LiuDepartment of oral and maxillofacial surgery, The Bethune Hospital/School of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, China. qlliu@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province 20210101308JCJilin Provincial Department of Finance JCSZ2021893-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vascularized free fibular flap is increasingly recognized as the standard technique for the repair of complex soft tissue and hard tissue defects in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Conventionally, the vascular supply to the skin island is derived from the distal perforators of the peroneal artery. However, complications may arise if these distal perforators are either absent or damaged during surgical procedures, highlighting the necessity to employ the proximal peroneal perforators as an alternative. This study aims to investigate the anatomical characteristics-including the presence, distribution, and origin-of proximal peroneal perforators through computed tomography angiography (CTA) prior to surgical intervention. A secondary objective is to confirm their viability when distal perforators are unavailable or when dual-skin paddles are needed.

methodsA comprehensive review was conducted involving 50 patients who underwent CTA examinations. Three-dimensional reconstruction of DICOM data was utilized to document the presence, quantity, location, and variations of proximal perforators. Relative positions of the origin points were measured, and the distances from these points to the fibula were calculated. Additionally, 11 studies were included in which a proximal perforator was successfully used to prepare a free fibula chimeric myocutaneous flap for the reconstruction of maxillofacial defects.

resultsAmong the 100 lower limbs evaluated, a successful identification rate of 98% for proximal perforators was achieved via CTA. Of those identified, 70% were found to originate from the fibular artery, 22% branched concurrently with it, and 8% emerged prior to the point of emergence of the fibular artery. Analysis through curve fitting indicated that the origin points of proximal perforators were predominantly located approximately 13.17 mm below the origin of the fibular artery, with their endpoints projecting about 123.9 mm below the fibular head.

conclusionsThe high prevalence of proximal peroneal perforators identified in this population, along with their relatively stable anatomical positions, suggests their significant surgical potential. In scenarios where the distal peroneal perforator is absent or suffers intraoperative injury, the proximal peroneal perforator can serve as a reliable alternative for preparing a free fibula osteal flap combined with a proximal peroneal perforator skin paddle.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyFibulaFree Tissue FlapsPerforator FlapAdultArteriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlastic Surgery ProceduresAnatomyCT angiographyFree fibular flapPerforatorPeroneal arterySkin paddle

Identifiers

PMID39819466
PMCPMC11737148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.