ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2025
Artificial intelligence driven innovations in biochemistry: A review of emerging research frontiers.
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelıng non-canonıcal Wnt sıgnalıng ın neural development and dısorders: a revıew of Wnt/PCP and Wnt/caMolecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Comparative characteristics ofWorld journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Synzymes: The Future of Modern Enzyme Engineering.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Innovative Formulation Strategies for Biosimilars: Trends Focused on Buffer-Free Systems, Safety, Regulatory Alignment, and Intellectual Property Challenges.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Green carbon dots in the era of AI: sustainable synthesis, intelligent drug delivery, advanced diagnostics, and bioimaging.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025Review
- Deep Learning and The Retina: A New Frontier in Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis.Current health sciences journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a powerful tool in biochemistry, greatly enhancing research capabilities by enabling the analysis of complex datasets, predicting molecular interactions, and accelerating drug discovery. As AI continues to evolve, its applications in biochemistry are poised to expand, revolutionizing both theoretical and applied research. This review explores current and potential AI applications in biochemistry, with a focus on data analysis, molecular modeling, enzyme engineering, and metabolic pathway studies. Key AI techniques-such as machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and AI-based molecular modeling-are discussed. The review also highlights emerging research areas benefiting from AI, including personalized medicine and synthetic biology. The methodology involves an extensive analysis of existing literature, particularly peer-reviewed studies on AI applications in biochemistry. AI-driven tools like AlphaFold, which have significantly advanced protein structure prediction, are evaluated alongside AI's role in expediting drug discovery. The review also addresses challenges such as data quality, model interpretability, and ethical considerations. Results indicate that AI has expanded the scope of biochemical research by facilitating large-scale data analysis, enhancing molecular simulations, and opening new avenues of inquiry. However, challenges remain, particularly in data handling and ethical concerns. In conclusion, AI is transforming biochemistry by driving innovation and expanding research possibilities. Future advancements in AI algorithms, interdisciplinary collaboration, and integration with automated techniques will be crucial to fully unlocking AI's potential in advancing biochemical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.