Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819458›Full record

Trial reportBMC oral health2025

Effects of tongue tamers and customized bonded spurs as an early treatment of anterior open bite: a randomized clinical study.

Safa B Alawy, Shaimaa S El-Desouky, Ibrahim A Kabbash, Shimaa M Hadwa

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05792553 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Tongue Tamers and Customized Bonded Spurs as an Early Treatment of Anterior Open Bite: A Randomized Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTanta UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled75ConditionsTongue Habits, Open BiteArmsbonded tongue tamers, customized bonded spurs, conventional fixed palatal spurs
NCT07509567 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Conventional Palatal Crib Versus Bonded Spurs in the Treatment of Anterior Open Bite: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMansoura UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsAnterior Open BiteArmsConventional Palatal Crib, Bonded Spurs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Safa B AlawyDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Shaimaa S El-DesoukyDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Health, and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt. shaimaaeldesouky@dent.tanta.edu.eg.
Ibrahim A KabbashPublic Health & Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Shimaa M HadwaDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Health, and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior open bite is a challenging condition for pediatric dentists and orthodontists as it causes aesthetic, speech, feeding, and psychological problems; this emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and interception of this malocclusion.

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of prefabricated metal-bonded tongue tamers and customized bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite. MATERIALS AND

methodsA sample of seventy-five children aged 7-9 years were assigned into three groups in which anterior open bite was treated using tongue tamers (group-I), customized composite bonded spurs(group-II), and conventional fixed palatal cribs (group-III). Study model and cephalometric x-ray evaluations were done before and after a three-month follow-up. Data was gathered and statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni tests.

resultsModel overbite at central and lateral incisors was increased in all groups. The highest increase was found in group-I(3.16 ± 1.17, 2.81 ± 0.94)and group-III(3.08 ± 1.10,2.99 ± 1.00) though the difference was not statistically significant. Also, cephalometric overbite was non-significantly increased in all groups with a high increase in group-III(3.13 ± 1.10). Overjet decreased in all groups, with the greatest reduction observed in group-I(-2.58 ± 1.02 and -2.47 ± 0.80 in model and cephalometric respectively) and was significantly different from group-II using pairwise analysis. There was a decrease in SNA and ANB in all groups with more significant improvement in groups-I(-1.20 ± 0.88,-1.65 ± 0.74) and -III(-1.31 ± 0.92, -1.62 ± 0.75) than group-II(-0.63 ± 0.46, -0.90 ± 0.43). Moreover, FMA measurements decreased significantly in group-I (-2.6 ± 1.11). Regarding SNB measurement, there was a non-significant increase in all three groups with the highest increase in group-I(0.49 ± 0.48) followed by group-III(0.34 ± 0.63). The U1/FHP and L1/GoGn angles were non-significantly decreased in all tested groups with the highest decrease in group-I(-1.76 ± 1.00 and-2.54 ± 0.87 respectively).

conclusionEarly treatment of anterior open bite, along with tongue tamers' simplicity and aesthetics promoted the malocclusion correction and occlusal function restoration.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05792553 , "Effects of Tongue Tamers as an Early Treatment of Anterior Open Bite", Retrospectively registered: 31/03/2023.

Indexed as

Open BiteOrthodontic Appliance DesignOrthodontics, InterceptiveCephalometryChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncisorMaleOrthodontic Appliances, FixedOverbiteTreatment OutcomeBonded spursOpen biteTongue tamersTongue thrusting

Identifiers

PMID39819458
PMCPMC11737204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.