Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning of immediate posterior implants by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05276765 (Peri-implant Soft Tissue Conditioning of Immediate Posterior Implants by CAD/CAM Socket Sealing Abutments), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Conditioning of Immediate Posterior Implants by CAD/CAM Socket Sealing Abutments (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxillary esthetic zone using bovine bone graft versus extended sticky bone with simultaneous implant placement: a randomized clinical study.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Wear of enamel antagonist to gradient zirconia vs full strength monolithic zirconia: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Progressive Gingival Digital Workflow with Chairside Abutment Customization for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations: A Pilot Comparative Clinical Study of Two Treatment Concepts.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Trueness of fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery for immediate implant placement in premolar and molar sites, an observational analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Treatment Planning for Single-Tooth Implant: A Clinical Guide and Literature Review.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Review
- Fracture strength and failure mode of implant-supported provisional resin composite crowns on hydroxyapatite-coated sulfonated PEEK abutments following thermomechanical loading.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnatomically formed healing abutments were suggested in literature to address many of the issues associated with immediate posterior implant insertion such as large extraction sockets that are extremely hard to seal without reflecting the mucoperiosteal flap, extraction sockets anatomy that are not suitable for regular healing abutment placement, and potentially high occlusal stresses when planning a temporary implant supported prothesis to improve the conditioning of supra implant tissue architecture and the emergence profile of the implant supported restorations. PURPOSE: To clinically evaluate the peri-implant soft tissue profile of single posterior implant retained restorations and to assess patient related outcomes of the implant restorations that were conditioned immediately by CAD-CAM socket sealing abutments (SSA) versus those conditioned by Titanium (Ti) standard healing abutments (SHA).
methodsTwenty participants received twenty-two single maxillary immediate implants after flapless minimally invasive tooth extraction and 3D guided implant placement in the posterior area (premolar and molar) and allocated randomly into two groups (n = 11), the intervention group: patients received PEEK SSA and the control group: the patients received Ti SHA. Modified Pink Esthetic Score (PES) was evaluated at 3 observation periods: Baseline T0 (immediate after implant supported crown insertion), 6 months T1 and 1 year of clinical performance T2. Patient satisfaction was assessed one week and one year after crown insertion using visual analogue scale (VAS).
resultsAt base line, after six as well as 12 months, SSA group showed statistically significant higher total modified PES scores than SHA group (P-value < 0.001). At the 2 clinical observation periods (baseline and after one year), SSA group showed statistically significantly higher overall satisfaction score than SHA group (P-value < 0.001).
conclusionAfter one year of clinical observation period, CAD-CAM PEEK socket sealing abutments together with flapless minimally invasive tooth extraction and 3D guided implant placement provided superior outcomes compared to Ti SHA in terms of peri-implant soft tissue profile.
trial registrationThis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with ID no. NCT05276765 on 03/03/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.