Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819292›Full record

ReviewASN neuro2025

Neurons Are Not All the Same: Diversity in Neuronal Populations and Their Intrinsic Responses to Spinal Cord Injury.

Justin R Siebert, Kiersten Kennedy, Donna J Osterhout

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ASN neuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin R SiebertPhysician Assistant Studies Program, Department of Health Care and Administration, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, Slippery Rock, PA, USA.
Kiersten KennedyNorton College of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Donna J OsterhoutDepartment of Cell & Developmental Biology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional recovery following spinal cord injury will require the regeneration and repair of damaged neuronal pathways. It is well known that the tissue response to injury involves inflammation and the formation of a glial scar at the lesion site, which significantly impairs the capacity for neuronal regeneration and functional recovery. There are initial attempts by both supraspinal and intraspinal neurons to regenerate damaged axons, often influenced by the neighboring tissue pathology. Many experimental therapeutic strategies are targeted to further stimulate the initial axonal regrowth, with little consideration for the diversity of the affected neuronal populations. Notably, recent studies reveal that the neuronal response to injury is variable, based on multiple factors, including the location of the injury with respect to the neuronal cell bodies and the affected neuronal populations. New insights into regenerative mechanisms have shown that neurons are not homogenous but instead exhibit a wide array of diversity in their gene expression, physiology, and intrinsic responses to injury. Understanding this diverse intrinsic response is crucial, as complete functional recovery requires the successful coordinated regeneration and reorganization of various neuron pathways.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationNeuronsRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsHumansCorticospinaldorsal root ganglionpropriospinalrubrospinalvestibulospinal

Identifiers

PMID39819292
PMCPMC11877619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.