Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819149›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

The "CUPCAKE" technique (coiled underlying pseudoaneurysm contained by a woven endobridge device) for treating intracranial aneurysms with atypical morphology.

Viktorija Vainauskaite, Yifan Ren, Mohamed Nasra, Davor Pavlin-Premrl, Sara Protto, Paul Siasat, Ali Khabaza, Ashu Jhamb, Christen Barras, Calvin Gan and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Viktorija VainauskaiteDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0148-9445
Yifan RenDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-6828
Mohamed NasraDepartment of Medicine, Northern Health, Epping, Melbourne, Australia.
Davor Pavlin-PremrlDepartment of Neurology and Neuroradiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Sara ProttoDepartment of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul SiasatDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-9782-5184
Ali KhabazaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Ashu JhambDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, St Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia.
Christen BarrasDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Calvin GanDepartment of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Ronan MotyerDepartment of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Paul SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Melbourne, Australia.
Justin MooreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Jeremy RussellDepartment of Neurosurgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.
Lee-Anne SlaterDepartment of Radiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Ronil ChandraDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Mark BrooksDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Winston ChongDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Monash Health, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Julian MaingardDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8958-2411
Hamed AsadiDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrasaccular flow diversion using the woven endobridge device (WEB; MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms has demonstrated large scale safety and efficacy. However, limitations arise from its structural configuration, restricting its application to specific aneurysm sizes and shapes. TECHNIQUE OVERVIEW: We introduce the CUPCAKE technique, a combination of conventional coiling followed by WEB intrasaccular flow disruption in select cases of atypical aneurysms with technically challenging morphology not typically treatable by WEB alone. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of a prospectively-maintained dataset from three Australian neurovascular tertiary referral centers, identifying patients treated with the CUPCAKE technique between April 2018 and September 2023. Evaluation of patient and aneurysm characteristics, procedure parameters, complications, radiological and clinical outcomes at follow-up was performed.

resultsThe CUPCAKE technique was used for the treatment of 22 intracranial aneurysms of total 169 treated with WEB. Overall successful immediate flow stagnation was observed in 95.5% (

conclusionSynergistic use of conventional coiling with WEB intrasaccular flow disruption presents a viable solution for technically difficult aneurysm treatment. In our series, 13% of all patients treated with WEB received CUPCAKE treatment, resulting in high technical success and no increase in thromboembolic complications with the union of two methods.

Indexed as

Interventional neuroradiologyinterventional radiologyintracranial aneurysmsubarachnoid hemorrhageWEB device

Identifiers

PMID39819149
PMCPMC11748411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.