Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819096›Full record

Trial reportNeurology2025

Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT.

David M Reboussin, Sarah A Gaussoin, Nicholas M Pajewski, Byron C Jaeger, Bonnie Sachs, Stephen R Rapp, Mark A Supiano, Maryjo L Cleveland, Valerie Hunter, Jamehl L Demons and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01206062 (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01206062 nacompletednot on this map

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran2010 to 2019Enrolled9,361ConditionsHypertensionArmsIntensive control of SBP, Standard control of SBP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Recent developments and challenges in hypertensive dementia over the past year.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Updates in the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2026
    Review
  7. Sex Differences in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Nondialysis CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: 10 Years Later.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Obesity, Hypertension and Brain Health.Current hypertension reports · 2025
    Review
  14. Car-BP: Taking Hypertension Screening Beyond Clinics.American journal of hypertension · 2025
    Article
  15. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

David M ReboussinDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-1309-2189
Sarah A GaussoinDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0000-0003-0850-7888
Nicholas M PajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Byron C JaegerDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-7399-2299
Bonnie SachsDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Stephen R RappDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-9766-3104
Mark A SupianoDivision of Geriatrics, Center on Aging and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-5087
Maryjo L ClevelandSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Valerie HunterSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0009-0001-3800-2963
Jamehl L DemonsSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Paula K OgrockiDepartment of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Alan Jay LernerDepartment of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
Gordon J CheluneDepartment of Neurology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.ORCID 0000-0003-2620-184X
Virginia G WadleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham; and.ORCID 0000-0003-4524-8395
Margaret L ScalesDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-7301
Nancy F WoolardSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Letitia H PerdueDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.ORCID 0009-0004-7809-0154
Kathryn E CallahanSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Jeff D WilliamsonSection on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine and the Sticht Center for Healthy Aging and Alzheimer's Prevention, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.

Funding

Wake Forest University School of Medicine Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG072947 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE CRAFT · 2021 to 2026
$24.3M
The SPRINT Alzheimer's, Seniors and Kidney Study (SPRINT ASK)R01AG055606 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI REBOUSSIN, DAVID M, WILLIAMSON, JEFF DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2023
$9.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072947NIA NIH HHS R01 AG055606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial suggested that intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases the risk of developing dementia. However, an insufficient number of probable dementia cases stemming from the trial's early termination made results inconclusive. The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of intensive vs standard SBP lowering on the longer term incidence of cognitive impairment leveraging extended follow-up for cognitive status.

methodsThis is a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Between 2010 and 2013, patients aged 50 years and older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk excluding those with diabetes mellitus or history of stroke were recruited from 102 clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico. Participants were randomized to a SBP goal of <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) or <140 mm Hg (standard treatment) and received treatment for 3.3 years. In-person cognitive assessment follow-up occurred through July 2018. Continued ascertainment of cognitive status by telephone began in December 2019 for participants who had not withdrawn consent or been previously adjudicated with probable dementia, but provided consent for future research. Data were analyzed using survival analyses.

resultsOf 9,361 randomized participants, 7,221 (77%) were eligible to be re-contacted. Cognitive status of 4,232 (59%) was ascertained (mean age 67 years, 36% female). We accrued a total of 216 new cases of probable dementia, less than our target of 326. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 248 participants of the intensive treatment group (8.5 per 1,000 person-years) were adjudicated with probable dementia, compared with 293 participants (10.2 per 1,000 person-years) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02). Consistent with earlier results from the trial, the rate of both mild cognitive impairment (MCI; HR, 0.87 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and a composite of MCI or probable dementia was lower with intensive treatment (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.99). DISCUSSION: Among ambulatory adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk, intensive treatment vs standard treatment of SBP for 3.3 years resulted in a lower risk of MCI and cognitive impairment including MCI or probable dementia, but not for probable dementia alone. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that intensively reducing SBP (target <120 mm Hg) decreases the risk of cognitive impairment in individuals aged 50 years and older with hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Clinical trial number NCT01206062.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCognitive DysfunctionDementiaHypertensionAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID39819096
PMCPMC11737843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.