Trial reportNeurology2025
Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT.
Trial report in Neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01206062 (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations of Blood Pressure Parameters with Cognitive Decline and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Reviews.American journal of hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Changes in arterial stiffness under blood pressure control are independently associated with cognitive impairment: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Trial
- The 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines: Key Updates, Historical Context, and Clinical Implications.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Recent developments and challenges in hypertensive dementia over the past year.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Article
- Updates in the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guideline.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Nondialysis CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Article
- Article
- Personalizing prevention for healthy cardiovascular aging: Geriatric cardiology in the 2024-2025 hypertension and dyslipidemia guidelines.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- To Live Long and Prosper: The Final Frontier for Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.CJC pediatric and congenital heart disease · 2026Article
- Associations of Blood Pressure Level and Variability With Cortical Thickness: A Cross-Sectional Analysis From the Maracaibo Aging Study.American journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: 10 Years Later.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Obesity, Hypertension and Brain Health.Current hypertension reports · 2025Review
- Car-BP: Taking Hypertension Screening Beyond Clinics.American journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Long-Term Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Mild Cognitive Impairment and Probable Dementia in SPRINT.Neurology · 2025Article
- A Food-First Prescription for Cognitive Longevity.Missouri medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial suggested that intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases the risk of developing dementia. However, an insufficient number of probable dementia cases stemming from the trial's early termination made results inconclusive. The goal of this study was to estimate the effect of intensive vs standard SBP lowering on the longer term incidence of cognitive impairment leveraging extended follow-up for cognitive status.
methodsThis is a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Between 2010 and 2013, patients aged 50 years and older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk excluding those with diabetes mellitus or history of stroke were recruited from 102 clinics in the United States and Puerto Rico. Participants were randomized to a SBP goal of <120 mm Hg (intensive treatment) or <140 mm Hg (standard treatment) and received treatment for 3.3 years. In-person cognitive assessment follow-up occurred through July 2018. Continued ascertainment of cognitive status by telephone began in December 2019 for participants who had not withdrawn consent or been previously adjudicated with probable dementia, but provided consent for future research. Data were analyzed using survival analyses.
resultsOf 9,361 randomized participants, 7,221 (77%) were eligible to be re-contacted. Cognitive status of 4,232 (59%) was ascertained (mean age 67 years, 36% female). We accrued a total of 216 new cases of probable dementia, less than our target of 326. Over a median follow-up of 7 years, 248 participants of the intensive treatment group (8.5 per 1,000 person-years) were adjudicated with probable dementia, compared with 293 participants (10.2 per 1,000 person-years) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72-1.02). Consistent with earlier results from the trial, the rate of both mild cognitive impairment (MCI; HR, 0.87 95% CI, 0.76-1.00) and a composite of MCI or probable dementia was lower with intensive treatment (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79, 0.99). DISCUSSION: Among ambulatory adults with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk, intensive treatment vs standard treatment of SBP for 3.3 years resulted in a lower risk of MCI and cognitive impairment including MCI or probable dementia, but not for probable dementia alone. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that intensively reducing SBP (target <120 mm Hg) decreases the risk of cognitive impairment in individuals aged 50 years and older with hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Clinical trial number NCT01206062.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.