ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2025
Protamine protects against vancomycin-induced kidney injury.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vancomycin causes kidney injury by accumulating in the proximal tubule, likely mediated by megalin uptake. Protamine is a putative megalin inhibitor that shares binding sites with heparin and is approved for the treatment of heparin overdose. We employed a well-characterized Sprague-Dawley rat model to assess kidney injury and function in animals that received vancomycin, protamine alone, or vancomycin plus protamine over 5 days. Urinary KIM-1 was used as the primary measure for kidney injury, while plasma iohexol clearance was calculated to assess kidney function. Animals had samples drawn pre-treatment in order to serve as their own controls. Additionally, since protamine is not a known nephrotoxin, the protamine group also served as a control. Cellular inhibition studies were performed to assess the ability of protamine to inhibit organic anion transporter (OAT1 and OAT3) and organic cation transporter-2 (OCT2). Rats that received vancomycin alone had significantly increased urinary KIM-1 on day 2 (24.9 ng/24 h, 95% CI 1.87-48.0) compared to the protamine alone group. By day 4, animals that received protamine with their vancomycin had KIM-1 amounts that were elevated compared to protamine alone as a base comparison (KIM-1 29.0 ng/24 h, 95% CI 5.0-53.0). No statistically observed differences were identified for iohexol clearance changes between drug groups or when comparing clearance change from baseline (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.