ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Pressure Protein Denaturation Compared to Thermal and Chemical Unfolding: Analyses with Cooperative Models.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corneal dose response from exposure to aJournal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Native mass spectrometry enabled by infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization for rapid measurement of protein-ligand biophysical parameters.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Heat-Induced Changes in the Chemical Structure, Hydrophobicity, and Size Distribution of Free/Bound Lipid Transfer Protein 1 and Their Effects on Beer Foam.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The thermodynamics of pressure-induced protein denaturation could so far not be directly compared with protein denaturation induced by temperature or chemical agents. Here, we provide a new cooperative model for pressure-induced protein denaturation that allows the quantitative comparison of all three denaturing processes based on their free energy, enthalpy, entropy, and cooperativity. As model proteins, we use apolipoprotein A-1 and lysozyme. The comparison shows that heat-induced unfolding is the most cooperative process. It is characterized by large positive enthalpies and entropies and (due to enthalpy-entropy compensation) small negative free energies. Pressure denaturation is less cooperative. The entropies and enthalpies are less positive, and the resulting free energies are more negative. Chemically induced unfolding is the least cooperative and shows the most negative free energies, in particular, if guanidinium hydrochloride (exhibiting a high binding affinity to certain proteins) is used as a denaturant. The three unfolding processes differ not only with respect to their cooperativity and the thermodynamic parameters but also with respect to the volume changes, suggesting structural differences of the denatured proteins. Using cooperative models thus yields significant new insights into the protein unfolding/folding processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.