Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39818862›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Pressure Protein Denaturation Compared to Thermal and Chemical Unfolding: Analyses with Cooperative Models.

Joachim Seelig, Anna Seelig

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Corneal dose response from exposure to aJournal of biomedical optics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joachim SeeligBiozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-104X
Anna SeeligBiozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3509-2569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thermodynamics of pressure-induced protein denaturation could so far not be directly compared with protein denaturation induced by temperature or chemical agents. Here, we provide a new cooperative model for pressure-induced protein denaturation that allows the quantitative comparison of all three denaturing processes based on their free energy, enthalpy, entropy, and cooperativity. As model proteins, we use apolipoprotein A-1 and lysozyme. The comparison shows that heat-induced unfolding is the most cooperative process. It is characterized by large positive enthalpies and entropies and (due to enthalpy-entropy compensation) small negative free energies. Pressure denaturation is less cooperative. The entropies and enthalpies are less positive, and the resulting free energies are more negative. Chemically induced unfolding is the least cooperative and shows the most negative free energies, in particular, if guanidinium hydrochloride (exhibiting a high binding affinity to certain proteins) is used as a denaturant. The three unfolding processes differ not only with respect to their cooperativity and the thermodynamic parameters but also with respect to the volume changes, suggesting structural differences of the denatured proteins. Using cooperative models thus yields significant new insights into the protein unfolding/folding processes.

Indexed as

Apolipoprotein A-IMuramidaseProtein DenaturationProtein UnfoldingTemperatureGuanidinePressureThermodynamicsApolipoprotein A-IGuanidineMuramidase

Identifiers

PMID39818862
PMCPMC11789134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.