ArticleJournal of psychopathology and clinical science2025
Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Article in Journal of psychopathology and clinical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Escalating rates of suicide among U.S. military Veterans have prompted the Department of Veterans Affairs to prioritize Veteran suicide as a chief clinical concern. Veterans Affairs-funded research is consistently dedicated to suicide prevention initiatives, reflecting a commitment to addressing this urgent issue. Although general guidelines have been proposed for recognizing and responding to suicide risk among research participants, to date, no guidelines have been published that are Veteran specific. Veterans exhibit unique suicide risk factors compared to civilians, including higher rates of suicide, a tendency to utilize more lethal means when attempting suicide, and substantial stigma surrounding mental health and help seeking, underscoring the need for Veteran-specific suicide risk assessment and management protocols (SRAMs). This article offers a comprehensive SRAM to guide research with Veteran participants. The protocol provides guidance on (a) accurate assessment of suicide risk, (b) risk management strategies commensurate to presenting risk, and (c) tailoring SRAMs for diverse study designs and contexts. By introducing this standardized, Veteran-focused SRAM, we aspire to bolster ongoing research dedicated to saving the lives of Veterans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.