ReviewMutation research. Reviews in mutation research
Inverse dose protraction effects of high-LET radiation: Evidence and significance.
Review in Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.International journal of radiation biology · 2025Pooled it
- Responses of the carotid artery to acute, fractionated or chronic ionizing irradiation, and differences from the aorta.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Inverse dose protraction effects of high-LET radiation: Evidence and significance.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological effects of ionizing radiation vary with radiation quality, which is often expressed as the amount of energy deposited per unit length, i.e., linear energy transfer (LET). For acute irradiation, high-LET radiation generally produces greater biological effects than low-LET radiation, but little knowledge exists as to how dose protraction modifies effects. In this regard, inverse dose protraction effects (IDPEs) are phenomena in which dose protraction enhances effects, contrasting with sparing dose protraction effects in which dose protraction reduces effects. Here, we review the current knowledge on IDPEs of high-LET radiation. To the best of our knowledge, since 1967, 80 biology or epidemiology papers have reported IDPEs following external or internal high-LET irradiation with neutrons, deuterons, α-particles, light ions, or heavy ions. IDPEs of high-LET radiation have been described for biochemical changes in cell-free macromolecules, neoplastic transformation, cell death, DNA damage responses and gene expression changes in mammalian cell cultures of human or rodent origin, gene mutations, cytogenetic changes, cancer, non-cancer effects (e.g., testicular effects, cataracts, cardiovascular diseases) and life shortening in non-human mammals (rodents and dogs), and induction of lung cancer and bone tumors in humans. For external irradiation of mammalian cells in vitro and mammals in vivo, IDPEs of low- and high-LET radiation have been reported for radiation doses spanning in excess of three or four orders of magnitude in slightly different ranges, and for radiation dose rates both spanning over six orders of magnitude in different ranges. IDPEs of high-LET radiation in humans have been reported following internal exposure, but not external exposure. Manifestations and mechanisms of IDPEs of high-LET radiation are far less understood than those of low-LET radiation, warranting further studies that will be pivotal to assess the implications for radiation protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.