Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39818098›Full record

ArticleEpidemics2025

Flusion: Integrating multiple data sources for accurate influenza predictions.

Evan L Ray, Yijin Wang, Russell D Wolfinger, Nicholas G Reich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Local Influenza Forecasts Outperform State-Level Forecasts in the United States.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evan L RayDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States. Electronic address: elray@umass.edu.
Yijin WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.
Russell D WolfingerJMP Statistical Discovery, Cary, NC, United States.
Nicholas G ReichDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States.

Funding

Statistical methods for real-time forecasts of infectious disease: expanding dynamic time-series and machine learning approaches for pandemic scenariosR35GM119582 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI Nicholas G Reich · 2016 to 2026
$4.8M
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001122NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last ten years, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has organized an annual influenza forecasting challenge with the motivation that accurate probabilistic forecasts could improve situational awareness and yield more effective public health actions. Starting with the 2021/22 influenza season, the forecasting targets for this challenge have been based on hospital admissions reported in the CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) surveillance system. Reporting of influenza hospital admissions through NHSN began within the last few years, and as such only a limited amount of historical data are available for this target signal. To produce forecasts in the presence of limited data for the target surveillance system, we augmented these data with two signals that have a longer historical record: 1) ILI+, which estimates the proportion of outpatient doctor visits where the patient has influenza; and 2) rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations at a selected set of healthcare facilities. Our model, Flusion, is an ensemble model that combines two machine learning models using gradient boosting for quantile regression based on different feature sets with a Bayesian autoregressive model. The gradient boosting models were trained on all three data signals, while the autoregressive model was trained on only data for the target surveillance signal, NHSN admissions; all three models were trained jointly on data for multiple locations. In each week of the influenza season, these models produced quantiles of a predictive distribution of influenza hospital admissions in each state for the current week and the following three weeks; the ensemble prediction was computed by averaging these quantile predictions. Flusion emerged as the top-performing model in the CDC's influenza prediction challenge for the 2023/24 season. In this article we investigate the factors contributing to Flusion's success, and we find that its strong performance was primarily driven by the use of a gradient boosting model that was trained jointly on data from multiple surveillance signals and multiple locations. These results indicate the value of sharing information across multiple locations and surveillance signals, especially when doing so adds to the pool of available training data.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanPopulation SurveillanceBayes TheoremCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.ForecastingHospitalizationHumansInformation SourcesMachine LearningModels, StatisticalSeasonsUnited StatesForecastingGradient boostingInfectious diseaseTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39818098
PMCPMC12367328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.