ArticleJournal of traumatic stress2025
Therapeutic impacts of recalling and processing positive autobiographical memories on posttrauma health: An open-label study.
Article in Journal of traumatic stress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the processing of positive memories technique and supportive counseling for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial.Behaviour research and therapy · 2026Trial
- Refining processing of positive memories technique: client perspectives on components, format, and feasibility.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Trial
- Daily-life associations between posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms, affect, and posttrauma cognitions in the context of the processing of positive memories.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
- The short-term stability and reliability of daily estimates of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.Journal of traumatic stress · 2026Article
- Positive autobiographical memories in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: An exploratory intervention study.Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The processing of positive memories technique (PPMT) entails detailed narration and processing of specific positive autobiographical memories (AM) and has shown promise in improving posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. We examined whether participants receiving PPMT reported decreases in PTSD and depressive symptom severity, negative affect levels/reactivity, posttrauma cognitions, and positive emotion dysregulation, as well as increases in positive affect levels/reactivity and the number of retrieved positive AMs across four PPMT sessions. Individuals (N = 70) recruited from the community completed surveys at baseline (pre-PPMT), each PPMT session, and after completing all four PPMT sessions. Multilevel linear growth models indicated session-to-session decreases in PTSD severity, β = -.17, p < .001; depressive symptom severity, β = -.13, p < .001; negative affect levels, β = -.13, p < .001; positive affect reactivity, β = -.14, p = .014; and posttrauma cognitions, β = -.12, p < .001; and session-to-session increases in negative affect reactivity, β = .18, p = .001. Paired-samples t tests indicated decreases in retrieved positive AMs, d = 0.40, p = .001, including specific positive AMs, and negative AMs, d = 0.23, p = .022, and increases in retrieved overgeneral positive AMs, d = -0.38, p = .002, from baseline to postintervention. Thus, PPMT may help decrease PTSD and depression severity, negative affect, posttrauma cognitions, and negative AM recall tendencies. Clinicians may need to incorporate additional skills into the PPMT framework to improve positive affect processes that can be sustained over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.