Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39817638›Full record

ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2025

A proposal on bird focal species selection for higher tier risk assessments of plant protection products in the EU.

Benedikt Gießing, Steven Kragten, Ines Hotopp, Anja Russ, Marie Fan, Dennis Sprenger, Arnd Weyers, Christian Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benedikt Gießingtier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
Steven KragtenSyngenta Agro GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany.
Ines Hotopptier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.
Anja Russtier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6236-5828
Marie FanBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.
Dennis SprengerCorteva Agriscience, München, Germany.
Arnd WeyersBayer CropScience, Monheim am Rhein, Germany.
Christian Wolftier3 solutions GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.

Funding

CropLife Europe
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The revised EFSA 2023 Guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products for birds and mammals emphasises vulnerability as a relevant criterion for focal species (FS) selection rather than prevalence. The EFSA 2023 Guidance suggests to rank FS candidates for each dietary group according to their expected exposure by estimating a species-specific daily dietary dose (DDD). Species experiencing higher exposure would be ranked as potentially more vulnerable and can be identified as FS candidates. The DDD is calculated using an estimated "proportion of diet an individual obtains from the (treated) crop" (PT). A PT is derived from a radio-tracking field study in the crop of interest, but such data are not available for all species. We introduce the frequency of occurrence in surveys (FOsurvey) in each study field from FS field studies as a proxy for PT in theoretical DDD calculations. The presence of a species during a high proportion of surveys, resulting in a high FOsurvey, could indicate a high proportion of foraging time spent in this crop. To evaluate whether FOsurvey is an appropriate proxy for PT, empirical PT values from radio-tracking studies for different bird species were correlated to respective FOsurvey values from FS studies in the same crop and growth stage. Based on 10 case examples covering different species and crops, a positive correlation was shown between PT and FOsurvey, supporting the suitability of the proposed approach. Based on a positive correlation between the species' prevalence and the new theoretical DDD, the list of the most relevant FS resulting from the new ranking approach is not expected to differ significantly from the FS selection, according to the methodology proposed in EFSA 2009. However, in a few cases, additional species were identified as potential FS, therefore requiring further consideration in the risk assessment.

Indexed as

BirdsEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsEuropean UnionRisk AssessmentEFSA guidancefarmland birdsfocal species selectionhigher tier risk assessmentprobability of exposure

Identifiers

PMID39817638
PMCPMC12047016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.