Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39817634›Full record

ReviewDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2025

New imaging techniques and trends in radiology.

Mecit Kantarcı, Sonay Aydın, Hayri Oğul, Volkan Kızılgöz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The evolving PI-RADS paradigm.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emergency radiology: roadmap for radiology departments.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. World journal of nephrology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mecit KantarcıAtatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-1043-6719
Sonay AydınErzincan Binali Yıldırım University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Erzincan, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3812-6333
Hayri OğulMedipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-5989-3729
Volkan KızılgözErzincan Binali Yıldırım University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Erzincan, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-711X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiography is a field of medicine inherently intertwined with technology. The dependency on technology is very high for obtaining images in ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although the reduction in radiation dose is not applicable in US and MRI, advancements in technology have made it possible in CT, with ongoing studies aimed at further optimization. The resolution and diagnostic quality of images obtained through advancements in each modality are steadily improving. Additionally, technological progress has significantly shortened acquisition times for CT and MRI. The use of artificial intelligence (AI), which is becoming increasingly widespread worldwide, has also been incorporated into radiography. This technology can produce more accurate and reproducible results in US examinations. Machine learning offers great potential for improving image quality, creating more distinct and useful images, and even developing new US imaging modalities. Furthermore, AI technologies are increasingly prevalent in CT and MRI for image evaluation, image generation, and enhanced image quality.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyArthrographic applicationscerebrospinal fluid flowmetryimaging techniquesmagnetic resonance imaging techniquesresonance spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID39817634
PMCPMC12417918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.