Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39817589›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2025

Exploring the Interface Between Planetary Boundaries and Palaeoecology.

Lindsey Gillson, Alistair Seddon, Ondřej Mottl, Ke Zhang, Kelly Kirsten, Peter Gell, Rob A Marchant, Christoph Schwörer, Estelle Razanatsoa, Paul J Lane and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lindsey GillsonLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity, Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9607-6760
Alistair SeddonUniversity of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8266-0947
Ondřej MottlDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-5081
Ke ZhangKey Laboratory of Lake and Watershed Science for Water Security, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-9016
Kelly KirstenSchool of Energy, Construction and Environment, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-1519
Peter GellFuture Regions Research Centre, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2251-5158
Rob A MarchantDepartment of Environment and Geography, York Institute for Tropical Ecosystems, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5013-4056
Christoph SchwörerInstitute of Plant Sciences and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8884-8852
Estelle RazanatsoaPlant Conservation Unit, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-7219-1411
Paul J LaneDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9936-1310
Colin J Courtney-MustaphiGeoecology, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-2590
John DearingGeography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1466-9640

Funding

Charles UniversityCzech Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China 42361144717Science and Research of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech RepublicUniversity of Cape Town
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concepts of planetary boundaries are influential in the sustainability literature and assist in delineating the 'safe operating spaces' beyond which critical Earth system processes could collapse. Moving away from our current trajectory towards 'hothouse Earth' will require knowledge of how Earth systems have varied throughout the Holocene, and whether and how far we have deviated from past ranges of variability. Such information can inform decisions about where change could be resisted, accepted or where adaptation is inevitable. The need for information on long-term (Holocene) change provides an interface for palaeoecology and sustainability that remains underexploited. In this position paper, we explore this interface, first discussing the need for long-term perspectives and introducing examples where palaeoecology has been used in defining safe operating spaces and constraining limits of acceptable change. We describe advances in quantitative methods for analysis of time-series data that strengthen the contribution of palaeoecology to the concepts of planetary boundaries and safe operating spaces. We consider the importance of issues of scaling from landscape to regional and global scales in operationalising planetary boundaries concepts. We distil principles for this field of research going forward and introduce three case studies which will form the basis of research on these topics.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEarth, PlanetEcologyPaleontologypalaeoecologyplanetary boundariesresiliencesafe operating spacesustainabilitytipping pointsvariability

Identifiers

PMID39817589
PMCPMC11737013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.