ArticleBioelectromagnetics2025
Toward Safety Protocols for Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS): A Computational and Experimental Approach.
Article in Bioelectromagnetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeling strategies in non-invasive spinal stimulation: perspectives on state-of-the-art.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the clinical applicability of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) expands, the need for PNS-specific safety criteria becomes pressing. This study addresses this need, utilizing a novel machine learning and computational bio-electromagnetics modeling platform to establish a safety criterion that captures the effects of fields and currents induced on axons. Our approach is comprised of three steps: experimentation, model creation, and predictive simulation. We collected high-resolution images of control and stimulated rat sciatic nerve samples at varying stimulation intensities and performed high-resolution image segmentation. These segmented images were used to train machine learning tools for the automatic classification of morphological properties of control and stimulated PNS nerves. Concurrently, we utilized our quasi-static Admittance Method-NEURON (AM-NEURON) computational platform to create realistic nerve models and calculate induced currents and charges, both critical elements of nerve safety criteria. These steps culminate in a cellular-level correlation between morphological changes and electrical stimulation parameters. This correlation informs the determination of thresholds of electrical parameters that are found to be associated with damage, such as maximum cell charge density. The proposed methodology and resulting criteria combine experimental findings with computational modeling to generate a safety threshold curve that captures the relationship between stimulation current and the potential for axonal damage. Although focused on a specific exposure condition, the approach presented here marks a step towards developing context-specific safety criteria in PNS neurostimulation, encouraging similar analyses across varied neurostimulation scenarios. Bioelectromagnetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.