Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39817238›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024

Artificial intelligence-powered solutions for automated aortic diameter measurement in computed tomography: a narrative review.

Eunice Man Ki Lo, Sisi Chen, Karen Hoi Ling Ng, Randolph Hung Leung Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eunice Man Ki LoDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sisi ChenDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Karen Hoi Ling NgDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
Randolph Hung Leung WongDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) are often asymptomatic but present acutely with life threatening complications that necessitate emergency intervention. Aortic diameter measurement using computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, surgical planning, and monitoring. However, manual measurement can create challenges in clinical workflows due to its time-consuming, labour-intensive nature and susceptibility to human error. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), several models have emerged in recent years for automated aortic diameter measurement. This article aims to review the performance and clinical relevance of these models in relation to clinical workflows. Methods: We performed literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies published between 2014 and 2024, with the focus on AI and deep learning aortic diameter measurements in screening and diagnosis of TAAD. Key Content and Findings: Twenty-four studies were retrieved in the past ten years, highlighting a significant knowledge gap in the field of translational medicine. The discussion included an overview of AI-powered models for aortic diameter measurement, as well as current clinical guidelines and workflows. Conclusions: This article provides a thorough overview of AI and deep learning models designed for automatic aortic diameter measurement in the screening and diagnosis of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs). We emphasize not only the performance of these technologies but also their clinical significance in enabling timely interventions for high-risk patients. Looking ahead, we envision a future where AI and deep learning-powered automatic aortic diameter measurement models will streamline TAAD clinical management.

Indexed as

aortic diameter measurementArtificial intelligence (AI)deep learningthoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA)thoracic aortic dissection (TAD)

Identifiers

PMID39817238
PMCPMC11729799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.