ArticleAmerican journal of medicine open2025
Use of a Nutritional Risk Assessment Tool to Guide Early Enteral Nutrition among Mechanically Ventilated Trauma Patients.
Article in American journal of medicine open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bayesian Analysis of Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score for Mortality Prediction in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Modified Nutritional Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score has been proposed as a tool to identify hospitalized patients at risk for malnutrition who may benefit from early enteral nutrition (EN) therapy. Objective: Our goal was to determine if mNUTRIC scores could predict, at time of intensive care unit admission, which mechanically ventilated trauma patients were at risk for malnutrition and might benefit from early EN, as indicated by reduced mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all adult trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours between 01/21/2012 and 12/31/2016, reviewing inpatient medical records, demographic data, disease markers, injury severity, and comorbidities. Bivariate statistics and multivariate regression analyses were used to investigate the correlation between time of EN initiation and mortality rates, as well as the relationship of mNUTRIC scores with EN commencement with early EN initiation being ≤48 hours and malnutrition risk mNUTRIC ≥5. Results: Among 931 patients reviewed, bivariate analysis showed higher mNUTRIC scores correlated with older, sicker patients and higher mortality. However, multivariate analysis revealed no significant association between higher mNUTRIC scores and increased mortality (OR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-2.1, p=0.52). Although most patients received EN within 48 hours, there was no association between mNUTRIC score and timing of EN initiation after adjusting for demographic variables and illness severity. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that while the mNUTRIC score can effectively identify malnutrition risk, it does not meaningfully inform early EN initiation timing nor predict mortality in mechanically ventilated trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.