Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39817180›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in parasitology2024

Emodepside: the anthelmintic's mode of action and toxicity.

Charity N Njeshi, Alan P Robertson, Richard J Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in parasitology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Differential Emodepside Efficacy in Drug-Resistant and Drug-SusceptibleTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charity N NjeshiDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Alan P RobertsonDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Richard J MartinDepartment of Biomedical Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Funding

RESISTANCE &MODULATION OF LEVAMISOLE RECEPTOR CHANNELSR01AI047194 · NIAID · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, RICHARD JOHN · 2001 to 2021
$5.8M
Slo-1K channels, TRP-2 channels, emodepside and diethylcarbamazine in FilariaR01AI155413 · NIAID · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Richard John Martin · 2020 to 2026
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047194NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI155413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nematode parasitic infections continue to be a major health problem for humans and animals. Drug resistance to currently available treatments only worsen the problem. Drug discovery is expensive and time-consuming, making drug repurposing an enticing option. Emodepside, a broad-spectrum anthelmintic, has shown efficacy in the treatment of nematode parasitic infections in cats and dogs. It is now being considered and trialed for the treatment of onchocerciasis, trichuriasis (whipworm), and hookworm infections in humans. Its unique mechanism of action distinguishes it from traditional anthelmintics, positioning it as a promising candidate for combating resistance to other current drugs. Here, we provide a brief review of the available information on emodepside's pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. We highlight the potential benefits and risks associated with its use, examining key toxicity effects. By exploring the literature, we aim to provide insights into the risks associated with emodepside that may impact its application in veterinary and human medicine. Although emodepside demonstrates a favorable safety profile, continued monitoring of its toxicity is crucial, particularly in vulnerable populations. This mini-review serves as a concise resource for researchers and clinicians interested in anthelmintic therapy.

Indexed as

anthelminticemodepsidehookwormpharmacokineticsriver blindnessSLO-1KtoxicityTrichuris

Identifiers

PMID39817180
PMCPMC11732007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.