ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Global Disparities in Outcomes of Pregnant Individuals With Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Scoping Review.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular outcomes for Australian women with rheumatic heart disease during pregnancy: A retrospective linked data analysis, 2002-2017.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- From Insight to Action: A National Patient-Centered Strategic Framework for Improving Reproductive Health Outcomes in Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Global disparities in the detection and management of rheumatic heart disease in pregnancy across endemic settings.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Rheumatic Heart Disease in Pregnancy in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Series Emphasizing Gaps in Access to Definitive Care.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Article
- Integrating equity and justice in rheumatic heart disease policy: addressing reproductive health challenges.International journal of public health · 2026Article
- Global burden and trend of rheumatic heart disease among women of childbearing age, 1990-2021, with projection to 2040.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Bridging Global Gaps in Cardiovascular Health: Catalyzing Action.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains as 1 of the major contributors to indirect pregnancy-related mortality and morbidity worldwide and disproportionately affects marginalized populations. Objectives: In this scoping review, the authors sought to explore the socioeconomic, cultural, and health care access-related causes of global disparities in outcomes of pregnancy among individuals with RHD. Methods: We performed a literature search of all studies published between January 1, 1990, and January 1, 2022, that investigated causes for disparate outcomes in pregnant individuals with RHD. Results: Of the 3,544 articles identified, 16 were included in the final analysis. The key reasons for disparate outcomes included lack of secondary antibiotic RHD prophylaxis; late and more severe RHD diagnosis, differences in management and antenatal care access; lack of expert and coordinated multidisciplinary care; suboptimal patient health education; inadequate access to RHD medication, intervention and surgery in pregnancy; and limited financial and economic resources. Conclusions: These findings illustrated using a life-course approach demonstrate opportunities for clinical and public health interventions to improve outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.