ArticleJACC. Advances2024
Trends and Disparities in CAD and AMI in the United States From 2000 to 2020.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mortality Trends from Acute MI with Underlying CKD in the US from 1999 to 2020: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the CDC WONDER Database.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Disparities in gastrointestinal bleeding and acute myocardial infarction-related mortality in the United States, 1999-2020.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Conventional Blood Parameters: Novel Hematologic Indices for Interpretable Artificial Intelligence in Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025Article
- Correlation Between Coronary Arterial Dominance and the Degree of Coronary Artery Disease Using Computed Tomography Angiography.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Disparities in chronic ischemic heart disease-related mortality across sex, race, and urbanization status in the United States, 1999-2019.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Trends in mortality from acute myocardial infarction among the obese population in the United States from 1999 to 2020: insights from CDC WONDER.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025Article
- Bridging Global Gaps in Cardiovascular Health: Catalyzing Action.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still pose a significant burden to the health care system, affecting population subgroups differently. Objectives: The purpose of the study was to describe age, sex, and racial disparities in mortality rates for CAD and AMI in the United States between 2000 and 2020. Methods: This was an ecological study with trend analysis of mortality rates using data from the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance databases. Results: Between 2000 and 2020, there was a significant decrease in the age-standardized mortality rates of both CAD (from 249.4 to 118 per 100,000 cases [ Conclusions: While a significant reduction in mortality rates is evident, the notable deceleration in this decline in recent years reflects a plateauing of earlier gains and highlights the need to identify new targets. The persistent disparities in the identified population subgroups necessitate further exploration to inform targeted interventions and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.