ReviewJACC. Advances2024
Global Health Inequities in Electrophysiology Care: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in JACC. Advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Atrial fibrillation and flutter as global drivers of heart failure: Burden and longitudinal trends over three decades.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Gene Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Mechanisms, Modalities and Therapeutic Applications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Impact of Quality of Life on Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Clinical, Demographic, and AI-Assisted Statistical Investigation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Temporal trends in mortality involving atrial fibrillation and rheumatic heart disease: a 25-year nationwide analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging Global Gaps in Cardiovascular Health: Catalyzing Action.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This state-of-the-art review examines disparities in the diagnosis, management, and outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias globally. These arrhythmias include atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachyarrhythmias underlying sudden cardiac death, and bradyarrhythmias associated with sinus node and atrioventricular node disease. Arrhythmias in low- and middle-income countries often result in higher mortality rates due to complex and poorly documented risk factors, lack of clinical expertise among health care personnel, lack of sufficient infrastructure, and challenges in access to care. Innovative approaches like repurposing pacemakers, mobile clinics, use of digital technology, and training initiatives are being explored to address these issues. This article highlights the importance of diagnosis of arrhythmias in varying resource settings, access to care in those settings, and ongoing efforts to expand access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.