ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2025
Effect of chronic total occlusion of coronary arteries on cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calcific Aortopathy in Response to Aging and Injury.Circulation · 2026Review
- PCI for Chronic Total Occlusions with Distal Diffuse Disease: Stent Alone vs. Stent plus Drug Balloon.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has significantly advanced the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS), particularly in elderly patients who often have coexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). Chronic total occlusion (CTO), a severe form of CAD, may negatively impact outcomes in TAVR patients, though data are limited. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of CTO on TAVR outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple electronic databases to identify studies comparing TAVR outcomes in patients with and without CTO. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with several secondary endpoints also assessed. Results: Six studies involving a total of 331,159 TAVR patients were included in this meta-analysis. CTO was associated with a significantly increased risk of in-hospital mortality (RR: 1.24; 95 % CI: 1.01, 1.52; p = 0.04), acute myocardial infarction (RR: 1.67; 95 % CI: 1.48, 1.89; p < 0.00001), acute kidney injury (RR: 1.46; 95 % CI: 1.37, 1.56; p < 0.00001), and vascular complications (RR: 1.47; 95 % CI: 1.28, 1.69; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.21; 95 % CI: 0.76, 1.93; p = 0.42), stroke (RR: 1.09; 95 % CI: 0.91, 1.30; p = 0.37), or bleeding events (RR: 1.19; 95 % CI: 1.00, 1.41; p = 0.06). Conclusion: CTO poses a significant risk in TAVR patients, particularly for in-hospital mortality and acute myocardial infarction. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for these patients, with consideration given to revascularization before TAVR. Further studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefits of prior CTO-PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.