Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816959›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Safety of the use of a microtracer with the feed additive consisting of chromium propionate (KemTRACE™ chromium) for all growing poultry species.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Giovanna Azimonti
Eleftherios Bonos
Henrik Christensen
Mojca Durjava
Birgit Dusemund
Ronette Gehring
Boet Glandorf
Maryline Kouba
Marta López-Alonso
Francesca Marcon
Carlo Nebbia
Alena Pechová
Miguel Prieto-Maradona
Ilen Röhe
Katerina Theodoridou
Jaume Galobart
Maria Vittoria Vettori
Jordi Ortuño
Fabiola Pizzo
Jordi Tarrés-Call

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of the FEEDAP opinion on the safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of chromium propionate (KemTRACE™ Chromium) of 18 March 2021, the EU Reference Laboratory for feed additives (EURL) was not in a position to recommend the method: proposed by the applicant for official control for the quantification of the organic chromium content in premixtures and feedingstuffs. The applicant subsequently proposed a new method of analyses, incorporating a tracer in the composition of a premix, which has been evaluated by EURL and recommended as official method for the quantification of the organic chromium content in premixtures and feedingstuffs. In view of the above, the Commission asked EFSA to issue a new opinion on the safety and efficacy of chromium proprionate (KemTRACE™ Chromium) as feed additive for all growing poultry species including the newly submitted information by the applicant that involves the use of the microtracer. The present opinion is limited to the assessment of the new information submitted by the applicant in support of safety of the proposed use of the microtracer in the composition of the premix. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of the microtracer in the premixture, at the proposed level of use, does not present a risk for the target species and the consumer. The microtracer should be considered a dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Therefore, any exposure of users to the microtracer via skin or the respiratory tract is considered a risk. The use of the microtracer at proposed conditions of use is safe for the terrestrial environmental compartment, but no conclusion can be made for the groundwater. The addition of the microtracer in the premix/feedingstuffs is not expected to have any impact on the efficacy of the additive, and therefore, the previous conclusion on the efficacy is still valid.

Indexed as

chromium propionateKemTRACE™ chromiummicrotracerpoultrysafetyzootechnical additives

Identifiers

PMID39816959
PMCPMC11733589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.