ArticleASIDE internal medicine2025
Safety and Efficacy of Metformin for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A U.S-Based Real-World Data Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.
Article in ASIDE internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Efficacy of Tirzepatide Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Article
- Efficacy of Tirzepatide Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist In Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. A Real-World Propensity Score-Matched Study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Managing idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is challenging due to limited treatment options. This study evaluates metformin as a potential therapy for IIH, examining its impact on disease outcomes and safety. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX database, covering data from 2009 to August 2024. The study included IIH patients, excluding those with other causes of raised intracranial pressure or pre-existing diabetes. Propensity score matching adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, Hemoglobin A1C, and baseline BMI at metformin initiation. We assessed outcomes up to 24 months. Results: Initially, 1,268 patients received metformin and 49,262 served as controls, showing disparities in various parameters. After matching, both groups consisted of 1,267 patients each. Metformin users had significantly lower risks of papilledema, headache, and refractory IIH at all follow-ups (p<0.0001). They also had fewer spinal punctures and reduced acetazolamide use. BMI reductions were more significant in the metformin group from 6 months onward (p<0.0001), with benefits persisting regardless of BMI changes. Metformin's safety profile was comparable to the control group. Conclusions: The study indicates metformin's potential as a disease-modifying treatment in IIH, with improvements across multiple outcomes independent of weight loss. This suggests complex mechanisms at play, supporting further research through prospective clinical trials to confirm metformin's role in IIH management and its mechanisms of action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.