ArticleProstate international2024
Hematospermia does not increase the risk of prostate cancer detection in prostate biopsy.
Article in Prostate international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies on the association between hematospermia and prostate cancer are insufficient. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of prostate cancer in patients with hematospermia using large United States population data. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. Administrative claims data were extracted from the IBM® MarketScan Research Database. Patients who had undergone a prostate biopsy and newly diagnosed patients with hematospermia before prostate biopsy from January 2007 to December 2014 were included using the International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Treatment methods were identified with the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. Results: A total of 369,170 adult men had a prostate biopsy. The mean age of patients was 62 years (range, 18 to 100 years). Among the TRUS bx patients, the number of patients with hematospermia was 1,357 (0.4%). The prostate cancer detection rate was significantly lower in patients with hematospermia than in patients without hematospermia (30.4% vs. 48.0%, Conclusions: Only 1.6% of hematospermia patients underwent a prostate biopsy. Prostate cancer was detected at a lower rate in those with hematospermia than in those without hematospermia. This study suggests that the presence of hematospermia prior to biopsy does not increase the risk of prostate cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.