Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816939›Full record

ArticleProstate international2024

Does the type of the previous biopsy affect the fusion prostate biopsy results?

Gokhan Sonmez, Abdullah Golbasi, Unsal Bas, Emre C Akınsal, Numan Baydilli, Sevket T Tombul, Halil Tosun, Abdullah Demirtas, Deniz Demirci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gokhan SonmezErciyes University, Department of Urology, Devision of UroOncology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Abdullah GolbasiKayseri City Hospital, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Unsal BasErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Emre C AkınsalErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Numan BaydilliErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Sevket T TombulErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Halil TosunErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Abdullah DemirtasErciyes University, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.
Deniz DemirciErciyes University, Department of Urology, Devision of UroOncology, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It has been more than a decade since fusion prostate biopsy (FPB) has been used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Therefore, patients with a previous history of negative FPB and ongoing suspicion of PCa are beginning to emerge. This study investigated whether the first biopsy type (standard or fusion) should be effective in deciding on a second biopsy. Methods: Male patients aged 40-75, with a serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value of less than 10 ng/mL and a negative biopsy history within the last 24 months, who underwent FPB in our clinic due to persistent PSA elevation and/or suspicious multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MpMRI) findings were included to the study. Patients were divided into groups according to the type of first biopsy (Group 1; those whose first biopsy was FPB, Group 2; those whose first biopsy was standard prostate biopsy). Some demographic and clinical data of the groups, as well as PCa detection rates, were compared. A Results: A total of 275 patients (Group 1: 84, Group 2: 191) were included in this study. The groups were similar in terms of age, PSA values before the first biopsy, PSA values before the second biopsy, family history of PCa, and prostate volume. PCa was detected at a higher rate in Group 2 than Group 1 (23% vs 15.5%, Concluison: The data obtained from this study indicate that the type of initial biopsy should be taken into account when deciding on FPB in secondary patients with a previous negative biopsy history.

Indexed as

Biopsy typeFusion prostate biopsyProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39816939
PMCPMC11733759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.