ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Role of neck dissections in the management of carotid body tumors.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Patients with Carotid Body Tumors: Prevalence and Management in a Retrospective Surgical Series from Two Tertiary Centers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Role of neck dissections in the management of carotid body tumors.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Carotid body tumors (CBTs) are rare neoplasms of the paraganglia at the carotid bifurcation. While typically benign, CBTs occasionally exhibit malignancy, metastasizing to nearby lymph nodes. Histopathologic analysis alone is insufficient to confirm malignancy, requiring metastases to non-neuroendocrine tissue for a definitive diagnosis. The role of selective neck dissections (SNDs) in detecting malignancy and guiding subsequent management remains uncertain. Method: A retrospective case series through electronic chart review was performed on 21 patients undergoing CBT surgeries between 2002 and 2022 at a Canadian institution. SNDs were performed on all 21 patients. Data collection included patient demographics, genetic and laboratory testing results, preoperative imaging, intraoperative and postoperative complications, histologic analysis of neck SND and tumor specimen, and follow-up results. Results: Of the 21 surgical resections, there were three cases (14.3%) of carotid artery injuries and six cases (28.6%) of nerve injuries. One patient (4.8%) experienced three intraoperative strokes. Three patients (14.3%) were found to have lymph node involvement, confirming malignancy, and underwent further treatment with radiotherapy. Interestingly, two patients with carotid injuries had malignant tumors, demonstrating a statistical significance between carotid injury and malignancy (OR 34.00, 95% CI: 1.48, 781.83, Conclusion: SNDs are a useful adjunct in detecting malignancy during CBT surgeries. The incidence of malignancy in CBT is low but not negligible, and SND should be considered in patients to prevent inadvertent underdetection of metastatic disease. This study's 14.3% incidence of malignancy suggests that there may be a rationale for considering the universal implementation of SND during CBT resections. Level of Evidence: 4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.