ReviewLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
The feasibility of endoscopic stapes surgery: A three-dimensional planning method.
Review in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The feasibility of endoscopic stapes surgery: A three-dimensional planning method.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a semi-automatic algorithm in assessing the feasibility and complexity of endoscopic stapes surgery preoperatively. Methods: A semi-automatic algorithm was developed to simulate endoscopic stapes surgery in 3D. To test the accuracy of the algorithm, five fresh-frozen cadaveric heads (ten ears) were used. Each head was CT-scanned, followed by segmentation and 3D reconstruction of the bones including the ear canal, middle ear, and ossicular chain. Two interventions were tested on each ear. Initially, the algorithm was digitally employed to simulate the endoscopic ear surgery. Subsequently, the actual endoscopic ear surgery was performed. Primary outcomes for each intervention included the amount of scutum removal (postoperative 3D model subtracted from preoperative 3D model), visibility of important landmarks, feasibility score, and a complexity questionnaire. Finally, the outcomes of the pre-operative planning and the actual procedure were directly compared to evaluate the algorithm's accuracy and usability. Results: The preoperative planning method achieved an accuracy rate of 70% in predicting the need for scutum removal. The mean volume of the removed scutum was 0.5 mm Conclusion: Preoperative planning models can assist ENT surgeons in evaluating the feasibility and complexity of endoscopic stapes surgery. With adequate training and testing on clinical cases, these models can significantly improve their predictive accuracy and thereby improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.