ArticlePain reports2025
Gender differences in clinical presentations and sensory profiles in patients with fibromyalgia: implications of peripheral and central mechanisms.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Diagnostic accuracy and psychometric properties of the fibromyalgia rapid screening tool in Mexican patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Pain in women: relevance of history of iron deficiency: comment on Laughey et al. (2025).Pain reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia based on magnetic resonance imaging.PloS one · 2026Article
- Potential of Vagus Nerve Stimulation to Modulate Fibromyalgia's Network Physiology: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Review
- Pharmacologic treatment of fibromyalgia: an update.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fibromyalgia has a high female predominance and research work has been focussing mainly on women. Objectives: We aimed to answer (1) gender differences in pain scores and quality of life, (2) any gender-specific subgroups defined by quantitative sensory testing (QST), and (3) correlations of QST parameters with pain intensity and questionnaire scores. Methods: We evaluated clinical presentations and QST profiles from 38 male and 38 age-matched female patients. Results: Women reported significantly higher scores in average daily pain, daily sleep interference score, average weekly pain, weekly sleep interference score, and revised fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (rFIQ). Based on LOGA classification, L0G2, mechanical allodynia or hyperalgesia without abnormal sensory loss, was the most common QST subtype which accounted for 28.9% of men and 26.3% of women. Approximately 34.2% of men and 26.3% of women displayed loss of function of small fibres with an increased cold or warm detection threshold. Cold detection threshold was negatively correlated with pain intensity and functional impairment, suggesting a peripheral mechanism. Central sensitization, defined as allodynia and hyperalgesia to thermal or mechanical stimuli, was found in two-thirds of male and female patients. Mechanical pain sensitivity was positively correlated with the severity of pain and associated symptoms in women, but not men. Conclusion: There was a marked gender difference in reported pain and quality of life. We have confirmed that central sensitization is a major mechanism for women. Our data suggested an important role of small fibre pathology in both men and women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.