ArticlePain reports2025
Role of bilevel erector spinae with high thoracic block vs conventional unilevel block in analgesia and reduction of pain in axilla in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07022353 (Ultrasound-guided Bi-level Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pre-emptive Single-dose Oral Tizanidine for Postoperative Analgesia After Mastectomy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound-guided Bi-level Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pre-emptive Single-dose Oral Tizanidine for Postoperative Analgesia After Mastectomy Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Analgesic efficacy of uni-level erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgery patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Regional anesthesia in breast surgery: An Italian expert consensus - Part 2: Results from a network meta-analysis evaluating 103 randomized controlled trials on regional anesthesia techniques for mastectomy with or without axillary clearance.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Management of pain associated with breast cancer surgeries is crucial in reducing incidence of postmastectomy pain syndrome. The pain distribution involves the anterior chest wall, axillary area and ipsilateral upper limb. Objective: This study was designed to investigate the effect of bilevel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with high thoracic block vs the conventional unilevel ESPB vs opioids in patients with cancer undergoing modified radical mastectomy regarding pain control and reducing pain in axilla. Methods: One hundred twenty-six female patients with cancer and American Society of Anesthesiology II, III were randomized into 3 groups: bilevel ESPB, unilevel ESPB, and control group. The primary outcome was total postoperative morphine consumption. Results: Total postoperative morphine consumption was higher for the control group compared with the bilevel and unilevel groups (5.5 ± 1.8 vs 3.0 ± 0.0 and 4.3 ± 1.6 mg, Conclusion: Both conventional unilevel and high thoracic bilevel ESPB had better analgesic profile when compared with opioids. Although the bilevel ESPB had additional merits to the unilevel ESPB in analgesic effects, both can be used effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.