Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39816841›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in parasitology2023

Gene editing in the nematode parasite

Jana Hagen, Subhanita Ghosh, Peter Sarkies, Murray E Selkirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in parasitology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Advances in Anthelmintic Target Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jana HagenDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Subhanita GhoshMRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter SarkiesDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Murray E SelkirkDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances, animal-parasitic nematodes have thus far been largely refractory to genetic manipulation. We describe here a new approach providing proof of principle that CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing of parasitic nematodes is achievable using vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein-pseudotyped extracellular vesicles for the delivery of Cas9-single guide ribonucleoprotein complexes. We demonstrate that extracellular vesicle-delivered ribonucleoproteins can be used to disrupt a secreted deoxyribonuclease in

Indexed as

CRISPR/Cas9extracellular vesiclesgene editingnematodenippostrongylus

Identifiers

PMID39816841
PMCPMC11731642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.