ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Global Trends in the Incidence and Primary Causes of Femoral Fractures, Excluding Femoral Neck Fractures: A Global Epidemiological Study.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing mechanical failure following intramedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures: a retrospective cohort study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Combined with In Vivo Validation to Elucidate the Molecular Mechanisms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Limited open reduction versus closed reduction in retrograde nailing for mid-distal femoral fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Article
- The incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability of forearm fractures: a systematic analysis based on the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Time, Tumor, and Thrombosis: Drivers of 30-Day VTE After Femoral Fracture Surgery.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fractures pose a significant global health challenge, with varying incidence trends and causes across demographics and regions. This study aims to analyze global patterns in the incidence and primary causes of femoral shaft fractures. Methods: Data from the Global Burden of Disease database were analyzed for femoral fractures (excluding femoral neck fractures) by age, gender, and socio-demographic index regions. The estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) was calculated to assess trends in the incidence of femoral shaft fractures. Results: Global femoral fracture cases increased from 8,559,886 in 1990 to 11,566,429 in 2021, a rise of 35.12%. However, the incidence rate dropped from 160.49 to 146.57 per 100,000 (EAPC: -0.35). Males consistently had higher rates, reaching 155.53 per 100,000 in 2021. The 15-49 age group recorded the most cases, while individuals aged 75 and older saw the largest rise in incidence, from 445.91 to 603.32 per 100,000. In 2021, Slovenia (616.1 per 100,000), Croatia (568.51 per 100,000), and Czechia (434.77 per 100,000) reported the highest rates, while Malawi, Kiribati, and Liberia had the lowest (<63 per 100,000). Leading causes were mechanical forces, motor vehicle injuries, and pedestrian injuries, with notable regional disparities. Conclusion: Although the global incidence rate of femoral shaft fractures has declined, it has risen significantly among older adults, increasing their burden. Understanding regional variations in causes is crucial for developing targeted public health interventions to address this growing issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.